2014
DOI: 10.1002/clc.22341
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hospitalization Costs for Acute Myocardial Infarction Patients Treated With Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in the United States Are Substantially Higher Than Medicare Payments

Abstract: Background: Acute coronary syndromes account for half of all deaths secondary to cardiovascular disease and represent a significant economic burden in the United States. Therefore, assessing hospitalization costs relative to Medicare reimbursement for these patients is important in understanding the impact of these patients on hospitals. We hypothesized that hospitalization costs for acute myocardial infarction patients treated with percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) were higher than their associated Med… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

2
19
2
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
2
19
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…found that 45.9% were aged 65 and older. 34 These rates are not much higher than the rate estimated for trial participants in the current study. Conversely, the divergence from population data becomes much more prominent at the 75-year threshold.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 53%
“…found that 45.9% were aged 65 and older. 34 These rates are not much higher than the rate estimated for trial participants in the current study. Conversely, the divergence from population data becomes much more prominent at the 75-year threshold.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 53%
“…It has been recently reported that the cost of patients with MI treated with percutaneous coronary intervention had stabilized but were still higher than Medicare reimbursements . The data presented herein further document that comorbid conditions in general, and AF in particular, can be a substantial driver of incremental cost.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 53%
“…It has been recently reported that the cost of patients with MI treated with percutaneous coronary intervention had stabilized but were still higher than Medicare reimbursements. 34 The data presented herein further document that comorbid conditions in general, and AF in particular, can be a substantial driver of incremental cost. Our finding that inpatient cost was the largest component of total cost was not surprising, because every patient in the study had ≥1 hospitalization during follow-up, and prior studies that assessed cost burden of AF in general have also found inpatient cost to be the largest component of total cost.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 52%
“…While performing the cost analysis for patients hospitalised for percutaneous coronary intervention for acute myocardial infarction, the increase in costs over the course of period from 2004 to 2009 was recorded. Amongst the 265 531 patients who received the treatment, the costs increased from $15 889 ($12 057–$21 204) in 2001 to $19 349 ($14 660–$26 282) . Myocardial infarction and percutaneous coronary interventions were also reported to be one of the most expensive and frequent cardiovascular events, accounting for more than 75% of fatal cardiovascular events .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%