2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.jdiacomp.2017.01.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hospitalization costs and clinical outcomes in CABG patients treated with intensive insulin therapy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Insulin is well recognized to promote adiposity and blood pressure, and we have examined those on insulin and on oral antihyperglycaemic drugs separately. A recent study of patients undergoing coronary bypass graft has shown that compared with patients receiving conservative insulin therapy (HbA1c between 48 and 63 mmol/mol), those receiving intensive insulin treatment (HbA1c between 32 and 48 mmol/mol) had significantly lower hospitalization costs and resource utilization . We have therefore presented diabetic patients treated with oral antihyperglycaemic agents and those with insulin separately to assess any bias introduced to the results among nondiabetic individuals.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Insulin is well recognized to promote adiposity and blood pressure, and we have examined those on insulin and on oral antihyperglycaemic drugs separately. A recent study of patients undergoing coronary bypass graft has shown that compared with patients receiving conservative insulin therapy (HbA1c between 48 and 63 mmol/mol), those receiving intensive insulin treatment (HbA1c between 32 and 48 mmol/mol) had significantly lower hospitalization costs and resource utilization . We have therefore presented diabetic patients treated with oral antihyperglycaemic agents and those with insulin separately to assess any bias introduced to the results among nondiabetic individuals.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…O:E ratios were calculated as previously described and reported with a 95% confidence interval (CI) with significance testing using Pearson c 2 analysis. 11 Statistical significance was defined as a 2-sided P value < .05. Statistical analyses were performed using SAS version 9.4 (SAS institute Inc, Cary, NC) and Prism 7 (GraphPad Software Inc, La Jolla, Calif).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most of them were taking oral hypoglycemic agents and only a small percentage of participants were taking insulin (2.5%) [ 12 ]. Therefore, we did not consider the functional role of insulin therapy in the outcome, although insulin therapy might reduce the risk of CVD in elderly people [ 37 , 38 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%