Hospitalists staffing levels and hospital performance

Abstract

| INTRODUC TI ONUnderstanding appropriate staffing levels and skill mix is an essential prerequisite in the quest for better quality, patient safety, patient experience, and efficiency. Most of the literature on staffing levels has focused on the nursing staff. Registered nurse (RN) staffing levels are associated with lower readmission rates, 1 lower mortality rates, 2 lower hospital-acquired infections rates, 3 and higher patient satisfaction. 4 Kane et al performed a meta-analysis on RN staffing levels and concluded that higher RN staffing levels are associated with better patient outcomes and quality. 5 Little, however, is known on the association between physician staffing Abstract Objective (or Study Question): To examine the association between hospitalists staffing levels and contract type with CMS Total Performance Score (TPS). Data Sources/Study Setting: Total performance scores were obtained from CMS, hospital-level data from the 2015 American Hospital Association Annual Survey Database, and unemployment rates from the Area Resource Health File. Study Design: We used cluster analysis to classify hospitals based on the distribution of various hospitalist contracts, and we used regression analysis to examine the association between TPS and hospitalist staffing levels and contract distributions. Hospital-level predictors included hospitalists staffing levels, RN staffing levels, and Magnet status. Market-level variables were unemployment rates and competition. Principal Findings: Higher staffing levels of employed hospitalists or hospitalists with a group contract are associated with higher TPS (with coefficient estimates of 0.85 and 0.83, respectively, and the same standard error of 0.22). Higher staffing levels of hospitalists under individual contract are negatively associated with TPS (with coefficient estimate of −0.43 and standard error of 0.21). Based on the regression analysis using hospital clusters as independent variables, hospitals with individual contractsor without hospitalists providing care had significantly worse TPS compared to hospitals that predominantly employ hospitalists (with coefficient estimate of −1.80 and standard error of 0.61). Magnet status, RN staffing levels, and small and medium size were positively associated with TPS. Medicare share of inpatient days, teaching status, AMCs, and for-profit and public nonfederal ownership were negatively associated with TPS. Conclusions:Adequate hospitalist staffing level is important for hospitals to achieve better performance. Hospitals need to consider the mix of arrangements or contracts that they have with hospitalists. K E Y W O R D Shospitalists, hospitals, staffing, total performance score, value-based purchasing | 45Health Services Research

Inpatient COVID-19 Mortality Rates: What are the predictors?

“…The positive relationship between staffing levels and patient outcomes has been documented for both RNs and hospitalists. 15,24,25 Previous research examined the relationship between nurse staffing levels and COVID-19 infection and mortality rates in nursing home settings but not in hospital settings. Harrington et al found a negative association between nurse staffing levels and infection rates in nursing homes.…”

“…14 Staffing capacity impacts the workload experienced by clinical staff which is associated with patient outcomes. 15 Additionally, hospital staffing levels impact patient outcomes indirectly via the significant impact on healthcare workers' psychological well-being. As Niels et al argue, the psychological burden that healthcare workers endure during a pandemic should be considered when making staffing decisions.…”

Associations between hospitalist physician workload, length of stay, and return to the hospital

“…The number of patients cared for by hospitalist physicians ("workload") is rising. 1,2 In 2012, 40% of hospitalists surveyed reported often exceeding a workload that they considered safe for patient care and felt that high workload led to delays in care, poor communication, and medication errors. 3,4 Some hospitalists also related their workload to adverse events, including patient morbidity and mortality.…”

Hospitalists, two decades later: Which US hospitals utilize them?

“…6 Additional benefits for using hospitalists include increased patient, family, and provider satisfaction. [7][8][9] While there is evidence of benefits associated with hospitals' use of hospitalists, little is known about characteristics of facilities that use hospitalists and the markets in which they operate.…”

“…Hospitals may use hospitalists as a staffing strategy to contain cost and achieve higher levels of quality and patient satisfaction as the use of hospitalists has been found to reduce costs 4,5 while providing similar or better quality of care and patient satisfaction. 7–9 This staffing innovation may also assist hospitals in meeting the requirements of Medicare Value-Based Purchasing, which is adjusting hospital payments as an incentive to improve quality and safety of care at reasonable costs.…”