2012
DOI: 10.3810/hp.2012.10.1004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hospitalists' Lack of Knowledge of the Confusion Assessment Method: A Barrier to Systematic Validated Delirium Surveillance

Abstract: Hospital medicine providers who responded to the survey reported encountering delirium often in their clinical practice; however, they also reported poor familiarity with and demonstrated poor knowledge of the CAM. These results suggest a potential barrier to systematic inpatient delirium screening and support increased delirium education and the use of validated delirium assessments among hospitalists.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, experience of working in geriatric medicine only resulted in a small improvement in knowledge [10]. Other studies of delirium in both medical inpatient and ICU settings have also shown significant deficits in doctors' understanding [11,12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, experience of working in geriatric medicine only resulted in a small improvement in knowledge [10]. Other studies of delirium in both medical inpatient and ICU settings have also shown significant deficits in doctors' understanding [11,12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, diagnosis is often delayed [23], and problems remain with recognition and documentation of delirium by nurses [10,24-26], and by physicians [27-29]. Although there are no definitive quantitative markers available to diagnose delirium, qualitative tools such as the Confusion Assessment Method (CAM) [30] and modified Richmond Agitation and Sedation Scale (mRASS) [31] have been validated.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Early diagnosis of delirium may lead to rapid improvement with decreased length of admission and reduced long-term complications, although the relationship between diagnosis and prognostic implications remains controversial [ 2 , 18 ]. Nevertheless, diagnosis is often delayed [ 23 ], and problems remain with recognition and documentation of delirium by nurses [ 10 , 24 - 26 ], and by physicians [ 27 - 29 ]. Although there are no definitive quantitative markers available to diagnose delirium, qualitative tools such as the Confusion Assessment Method (CAM) [ 30 ] and modified Richmond Agitation and Sedation Scale (mRASS) [ 31 ] have been validated.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nonetheless, this work builds upon previous literature suggesting a potential discordance between clinicians' perceived knowledge of and clinical competency in delirium care and adds to the relatively limited literature focusing on hospitalist clinicians. 5,9 It is important to shape future educational interventions in the context of clinician attitudes and knowledge gaps, and follow-up focus groups may help further elucidate hospitalist perspectives contributing to the over-estimation of delirium prevalence and infrequent use of validated screening approaches. Hospital medicine clinicians may also benefit from education regarding potential long-term sequelae of delirium, including cognitive impairment and healthcare costs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%