2005
DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-3148.2005.00247.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hospital Utilization among Persons with an Intellectual Disability, Ontario, Canada, 1995–2001

Abstract: Background  It has been suggested that persons with an intellectual disability consume a disproportionate amount of hospital services. Policy changes in Ontario in the 1970s and 1980s made it necessary for community health services to accommodate this population that formerly received most of its medical care in the institutions where they lived. It is frequently suggested that community health services are currently inadequate to care for this population. Methods  The study was a retrospective analysis of rou… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
75
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 65 publications
(78 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
3
75
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, research has shown that these community-based services are unable to adequately deal with the concerns of individuals with ID and their family caregivers, particularly in regard to mental health issues (Lunsky, Garcin, Morin, Cobigo, & Bradley, 2007;Spiller et al, 2007;Ziring et al, 1988). Past research in Canada has found individuals with ID to be disproportionately high users of mental health services, with mental health issues accounting for the majority of hospitalizations in this population (Balogh, Hunter, & Ouellette-Kuntz, 2005;Lunsky & Balogh, 2010) and emergency department (ED) use occurring more than twice as frequently in those with a psychiatric disorder and ID as in those with a psychiatric disorder without ID (Lunsky et al, 2011). Individuals with ID are recognized to be at a greater risk for developing problem behaviors and mental health issues than the general population (Emerson & Hatton, 2007;Whitaker & Read, 2006).…”
Section: Please Scroll Down For Articlementioning
confidence: 93%
“…However, research has shown that these community-based services are unable to adequately deal with the concerns of individuals with ID and their family caregivers, particularly in regard to mental health issues (Lunsky, Garcin, Morin, Cobigo, & Bradley, 2007;Spiller et al, 2007;Ziring et al, 1988). Past research in Canada has found individuals with ID to be disproportionately high users of mental health services, with mental health issues accounting for the majority of hospitalizations in this population (Balogh, Hunter, & Ouellette-Kuntz, 2005;Lunsky & Balogh, 2010) and emergency department (ED) use occurring more than twice as frequently in those with a psychiatric disorder and ID as in those with a psychiatric disorder without ID (Lunsky et al, 2011). Individuals with ID are recognized to be at a greater risk for developing problem behaviors and mental health issues than the general population (Emerson & Hatton, 2007;Whitaker & Read, 2006).…”
Section: Please Scroll Down For Articlementioning
confidence: 93%
“…There are three other large-scale studies [139][140][141] on hospitalisations of adults with ID that we are aware of, but none differentiated between emergency and planned admissions. Our focus on preventable emergency admissions means that any comparison is difficult, as we would not expect good primary care management to decrease planned admissions for ACSCs.…”
Section: Mortalitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The choice of codes to include was informed by other studies (Balogh, Hunter, & Ouellette-Kuntz, 2005;Ouellette-Kuntz et al, 2009;Westerinen, Kaski, Virta, Almqvist, & Iivanainen, 2007). Individuals with intellectual and developmental disabilities were defined as anyone who had at least one of the listed codes during a hospital stay, emergency room visit, or home care assessment, or who had at least two physician claims with such codes or who had a designation within a list of "conditions related to developmental disability status" in the Chronic Care Reporting System for Long-Term Care.…”
Section: Cohort Creationmentioning
confidence: 99%