1999
DOI: 10.1177/1359104599004003008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hospital Protocol for the Evaluation of Munchausen by Proxy

Abstract: A B S T R A C TThe objective of this article is to describe guidelines for creating a hospital protocol for the evaluation, reporting, and treatment of Munchausen by Proxy in the hospital setting, in order to maximize care and minimize legal risks. The creation of a multidisciplinary team is suggested to evaluate and treat the family. Specific aspects of evaluation are addressed. Discussion focuses on risk management and decreasing liability while providing appropriate care to patients, both in the hospital an… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…When it is suspected that no true disease exists and it is felt that harm to the child is imminent, the use of covert videotape surveillance has been recommended. [15][16][17] Such surveillance may capture a parent's misbehavior, as when a child is being physically abused in the hospital. It may fail to confirm reported symptoms when they are being exaggerated or exonerate a suspected caregiver when a disease truly exists.…”
Section: Diagnosismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When it is suspected that no true disease exists and it is felt that harm to the child is imminent, the use of covert videotape surveillance has been recommended. [15][16][17] Such surveillance may capture a parent's misbehavior, as when a child is being physically abused in the hospital. It may fail to confirm reported symptoms when they are being exaggerated or exonerate a suspected caregiver when a disease truly exists.…”
Section: Diagnosismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The purpose of this article is to present guidelines for the forensic evaluation of possible illness falsification and factitious disorder, NOS, and for formulating recommendations. Recommendations for the hospital evaluation of MBP are published elsewhere (Sanders, 1999).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%