2009
DOI: 10.1080/00036840701564384
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hospital performance in a noncompetitive environment

Abstract: In this article, we perform a quantitative analysis of the performance of hospital services in a nonmarket environment based on a very complete data set. Evaluating efficiency in a nonmarket system is important since the absence of market mechanisms could yield large inefficiencies. In fact, we show that hospital performance varies greatly across institutions. Specifically, our results suggest that hospitals with high levels of quasi-fixed factors are less efficient than other institutions. In general, hospita… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Given these caveats the results are still interesting in terms of potentially pointing towards differences. Bilodeaua et al (2009) find that large hospitals may fail to efficiently use technology, while smaller hospitals, which do not have access to the latest technology, may be more efficient at using the technology they do have access to. This may have been evident if we had been able to assess quality of care, which may be impacted upon by technological developments.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Given these caveats the results are still interesting in terms of potentially pointing towards differences. Bilodeaua et al (2009) find that large hospitals may fail to efficiently use technology, while smaller hospitals, which do not have access to the latest technology, may be more efficient at using the technology they do have access to. This may have been evident if we had been able to assess quality of care, which may be impacted upon by technological developments.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…In this study, we use a nonparametric approach known as DEA to estimate a production frontier and the distance of each hospital to the frontier. DEA is one of the two main methods used to estimate hospital technical or cost efficiency (Bilodeau, Cremiedx, and Quellette ; Varabyova and Schreyögg ; Chowdhury and Zelenyuk ; Ferreira and Marques ). The main advantage of the DEA approach in the present case is that it allows for the estimation of frontiers for multi‐outputs; in the case of inpatient acute care, we want to account for the quality as well as the quantity of stays a hospital produces (see below, subsection “outputs”), because it reflects the dilemma governments face: How can we reduce wait‐times without jeopardizing quality?…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Appendix describes the main findings of Canadian studies, which can be summarized as follows: Hospital size, occupancy rate, case mix index, urbanity, and teaching status have significant influences on hospital efficiency (Gruca and Nath ; Bilodeau, Crémieux, and Ouellette ; Bilodeau et al. ; Bilodeau, Cremiedx, and Quellette ; Chowdhury, Wodchis, and Laporte ; Asmild, Hollingsworth, and Birch ; Chowdhury and Zelenyuk ).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, Borzekowski (), Bilodeau et al . (), Keeler and Ying (), Vita (), Grannemann et al . () and Conrad and Strauss () all find no evidence or limited evidence of scale economies for hospital care.…”
Section: Previous Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%