Hospital factors that influence ICU admission decision-making: a qualitative study of eight hospitals

Abstract

Purpose Some hospitals in the United States (US) use intensive care 20 times more than others. Since intensive care is lifesaving for some but potentially harmful for others, there is a need to understand factors that influence how intensive care unit (ICU) admission decisions are made. Methods A qualitative analysis of eight US hospitals was conducted with semi-structured, one-on-one interviews supplemented by site visits and clinical observations. Results A total of 87 participants (24 nurses, 52 physicians, and 11 other staff) were interviewed, and 40 h were spent observing ICU operations across the eight hospitals. Four hospital-level factors were identified that influenced ICU admission decision-making. First, availability of intermediate care led to reallocation of patients who might otherwise be sent to an ICU. Second, participants stressed the importance of ICU nurse availability as a key modifier of ICU capacity. Patients cared for by experienced general care physicians and nurses were less likely to receive ICU care. Third, smaller or rural hospitals opted for longer emergency department patient-stays over ICU admission to expedite interhospital transfer of critically ill patients. Fourth, lack of clarity in ICU admission policies led clinicians to feel pressured to use ICU care for patients who might otherwise not have received it. Conclusion Health care systems should evaluate their use of ICU care and establish institutional patterns that ensure ICU admission decisions are patient-centered but also account for resources and constraints particular to each hospital. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00134-023-07031-w.

Characteristics and outcomes of cancer patients admitted to intensive care units in cancer specialized hospitals in China

“…However, the decision for ICU admission is often challenging (Valley et al 2023 ). In balancing potential medical outcomes, individual rights and desires, and economic constraints and availability of resources, it is important to form instructive admission policies based on the predicted benefits for the patients (Toffart et al 2023 ).…”

The current state of intensive care unit discharge practices - Results of an international survey study

“…This finding is supported by the related literature (5, [12][13][14][15][16][17][18], especially as study insights often result from rather small and regional to local cohorts. In many countries, the COVID-19 pandemic and retrospective analysis highlighted the present lack of clear discharge guidelines, specified admission criteria and acuity levels, and the match of acute care capacities with patient group needs (19)(20)(21)(22)(23). The survey was launched towards the end of the pandemic, and the ongoing appreciation for the topic was demonstrated by 219 participants from 40 countries, primarily holding senior positions and having long-term ICU work experience, who went through a list of 29 questions and provided quite a decent number of individual comments.…”

Admission time and outcomes of patients admitted to intensive care unit in a tertiary hospital in Nepal: an observational study

“…1 Initial resuscitation efforts of critically ill patients have significant effect on patient outcomes. 2 As patients can present at any time of day, provision of all resources is to be made throughout the day. However, a reduced number of staff and working efficiency because of long working hours, the unavailability of 24/7 intensivist staffing, and the absence of the same level of hospital services like laboratory investigations during off hours have been reported in the literature to affect the outcomes of the critically ill patients.…”