To the Editor Medical care is typically a private matter; however, when we care for individuals who are incarcerated, a third actor is forcibly introduced into the space between patient and clinician-a state agent tasked with maintaining custody of the patient, and beholden to correctional not medical standards. The care of incarcerated individuals in community medical centers tends to illuminate this complex medical−correctional interface.Introduction of carceral stakeholders into the hospital precipitates conscious and unconscious deviations to usual practice by clinicians. The study by Batbold et al 1 highlights important inconsistencies in surrogate decision-making as one such deviation, although correctional influence similarly affects incarcerated patient's health privacy, transitions of care, and even the ability to lie unchained in a hospital bed. 2 Incarceration causes suffering to all it touches, with the negative health effects of the carceral system resulting in profound intergenerational harm to incarcerated individuals, their families, and communities. 3 Some ill effects also spread to those overseeing custody, with correctional officers demonstrating increased rates of posttraumatic stress disorder and suicide. 4 Providing humane care for incarcerated individuals stands to benefit all.Yet calls to improve care often fall on the individual clinician or health care system, with little consideration for meaningful collaboration with correctional officials to create ethical approaches to care or pathways for communication in advance of medical events. The work by Batbold et al 1 offers a hopeful glimpse into what proactive, cooperative efforts between medical and correctional systems could look like, finding several instances where "collaborative communication between the clinical team and prison employees" identified appropriate surrogates for unrepresented patients or redirected medical practitioners to correct surrogacy pathways.As long as incarceration exists, proceeding in a unilateral manner and disregarding the presence and potential partner-ship of correctional stakeholders will delay efforts to improve the health of the 2 million adults held in the US criminal justice system. Collaboration between medical and correctional systems is required if we envision a future where health care professionals and correctional officers are similarly invested in the well-being of the individuals in our dual charge, with clear delineation of responsibilities, unified guiding principles for care, and a commitment to ethically sound practices. 5