2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.tvjl.2014.07.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hospital-based study of dental pathology and faecal particle size distribution in horses with large colon impaction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
1
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
9
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, the results demonstrate that in contrast to previous findings (Argenzio et al, 1974;Björnhag et al, 1984;Sperber et al, 1992) and resulting graphical reviews (Drogoul et al, 2000;Van Weyenberg, Sales, & Janssens, 2006), net differences in the passage of different-sized particles through the gastrointestinal tract are not a decisive part of the digestive physiology of horses. Notably, previous findings on a selective large particle retention in the dorsal colon of horses were observed with polyethylene markers of 10 and 20 mm length, which is not representative of an important fraction of the horse's digesta when compared to the sieve results of the present study in Figure 3, or to reported mean FPS in equids of 0.5-1.9 mm (Carmalt et al, 2005;Clauss et al, 2014;Fritz et al, 2009;Gunnarsdottir et al, 2014;Zwirglmaier et al, 2013). Given these data on physiological mean particle sizes in the digesta of horses, the 10-to 20-mm particles used by Argenzio et al (1974) might even be more comparable to the foreign bodies, the coarse hay or "lawnmower grass" typically associated with caecal or colonic impaction (Collatos & Romano, 1993;Dabareiner & White, 1995).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Thus, the results demonstrate that in contrast to previous findings (Argenzio et al, 1974;Björnhag et al, 1984;Sperber et al, 1992) and resulting graphical reviews (Drogoul et al, 2000;Van Weyenberg, Sales, & Janssens, 2006), net differences in the passage of different-sized particles through the gastrointestinal tract are not a decisive part of the digestive physiology of horses. Notably, previous findings on a selective large particle retention in the dorsal colon of horses were observed with polyethylene markers of 10 and 20 mm length, which is not representative of an important fraction of the horse's digesta when compared to the sieve results of the present study in Figure 3, or to reported mean FPS in equids of 0.5-1.9 mm (Carmalt et al, 2005;Clauss et al, 2014;Fritz et al, 2009;Gunnarsdottir et al, 2014;Zwirglmaier et al, 2013). Given these data on physiological mean particle sizes in the digesta of horses, the 10-to 20-mm particles used by Argenzio et al (1974) might even be more comparable to the foreign bodies, the coarse hay or "lawnmower grass" typically associated with caecal or colonic impaction (Collatos & Romano, 1993;Dabareiner & White, 1995).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 89%
“…However, in horses, the more intensive ingestive mastication (Dittmann, Kreuzer, Runge, & Clauss, ; Janis, Constable, Houpt, Streich, & Clauss, ), together with their particularly efficient dental design (Rensberger, ), could reduce labelled long particles that are fed to the animals to such a degree that the result no longer represents different‐sized particles. This concern is supported by the mean particle size observed in horse faeces of 0.5–1.9 mm (Carmalt, Cymbaluk, & Townsend, ; Clauss et al., ; Fritz et al., ; Gunnarsdottir et al., ; Zwirglmaier et al., ), which, due to the absence of rumination, can be used as a proxy for their chewing efficiency during ingestion (Carmalt & Allen, ). It is also supported by the finding that horses destroy a higher proportion of seeds during ingestive mastication than cattle (Janzen, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Predisposing factors to this condition in horses are water deprivation, poor dentition, and dietary changes (Uzal et al 2016), as observed in the current study. Dental problems were evidenced in three cases, but, still, a previous work was not able to establish an association between dental pathology, fecal particle size, and impaction colic in horses (Gunnarsdottir et al 2014). Furthermore, another important predisposing factor identified was previous colic surgery in four cases.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 74%
“…It may also be argued that the recurrent episodes of colic could have been related to inefficient or ineffective mastication that, in turn, may have predisposed the horse to large colon impaction colic. While an attractive theory, previous published work looking at the effect of dental pathology on faecal particle size in horses with large colon impaction does not support this argument (Carmalt and Allen 2006;Gunnarsdottir et al 2014). It is possible that well-nourished horses have the privilege of being more selective in their forage choice and despite oral or TMJ pain, continue to chew their feed, whereas horses that are malnourished may be more ravenous, swallowing the feed that is not properly processed.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%