2015
DOI: 10.4081/ecj.2015.4920
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hospital-based emergency care in the Russian Federation: a historical analysis of statutory regulations

Abstract: The ongoing changes the system of emergency care (EC) in the Russian Federation (RF), especially its in-hospital component, require modifications of applicable laws. This paper analyzes past development and evaluates the current state of regulations pertinent to hospital-based EC in RF. We have reviewed and analyzed the regulatory statutes that governed hospital-based emergency care in Russia between 1735 and 2013. The study traces the development of past regulations (legal and normative acts) applicable to EC… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

1
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Since the nineteenth century, the majority of Russian hospitals (or their individual specialty departments at large facilities) have had admission wards (AWs; sometimes translated “receiving bays”) intended for the initial reception, triage (surgical/medical), and sanitary screening of patients. The gradual evolution of such units in Russia has been described in some detail in a recent English language article [ 11 ] and will not be repeated here.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since the nineteenth century, the majority of Russian hospitals (or their individual specialty departments at large facilities) have had admission wards (AWs; sometimes translated “receiving bays”) intended for the initial reception, triage (surgical/medical), and sanitary screening of patients. The gradual evolution of such units in Russia has been described in some detail in a recent English language article [ 11 ] and will not be repeated here.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%