2000
DOI: 10.1086/501718
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hospital- and Community-Based Surveillance of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus: Previous Hospitalization is the Major Risk Factor

Abstract: These findings demonstrate that the incidence of MRSA is higher than previously reported and that hospital contact is the single most important risk factor for the acquisition of MRSA in our community. Screening for MRSA in previously hospitalized patients at the time of hospitalization may reduce nosocomial spread and indirectly reduce the incidence of MRSA in the community.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

4
43
1
2

Year Published

2001
2001
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 94 publications
(51 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
(14 reference statements)
4
43
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…These two factors, especially the former, are, without any doubt, among the strongest predictors of MRSA infections in older and newer studies. 4,[9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][20][21][22][23][25][26][27][28]33,34 Obviously, differences in our results compared to the above-described studies may be partly due to different study design and differences in populations studied, as noted in a recent meta-analysis. 38 Additionally, from a subanalysis of the blood isolates of our study groups, the mean number of antibiotic-days did emerge as independent predictor of a subsequent HCA-MRSA bacteremia.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…These two factors, especially the former, are, without any doubt, among the strongest predictors of MRSA infections in older and newer studies. 4,[9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][20][21][22][23][25][26][27][28]33,34 Obviously, differences in our results compared to the above-described studies may be partly due to different study design and differences in populations studied, as noted in a recent meta-analysis. 38 Additionally, from a subanalysis of the blood isolates of our study groups, the mean number of antibiotic-days did emerge as independent predictor of a subsequent HCA-MRSA bacteremia.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4,[9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23] Both total antimicrobial use as well as specific antimicrobial classes have been implicated. [11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18]24,25 Included in these classes are β-lactamic antibiotics, 14,26-33 cephalosporins, 11,12,16,22,29 aminoglycosides, 22,33,34 macrolides, 27 glycopeptides 15,[27][28][29]34 and fluoroquinolones (FQs). 6,11,12,14,[26][27][28][29][35][36][37] A relatively recently published meta-analysis detected a clear association between exposure to antibiotics and MRSA isolation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…[10][11][12] Colonization of MRSA has been found in 1.5% of the general population, but it increased to 9.4% when the patients were exposed to a healthcare facility. 13,14 Consequently, about 85% of MRSA infections are health care associated. 15 Because 88% of our patients who showed bacterial keratitis were involved with HCU stay, it was expected that MRSA could be a common pathogen in our patients.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By 1999, just over 5% of S aureus strains isolated from hospitalized patients in Canada were methicillin-resistant (4). The corresponding rate for isolates from American hospitals was 35% (5,6). Prevention of transmission of MRSA in hospitals has focused on infection-control practices and surveillance (6)(7)(8).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%