2002
DOI: 10.1089/109662102760269788
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hospice Care for the Incarcerated in the United States: An Introduction

Abstract: Prison populations throughout the Unites States are growing; the 1990s saw an average 6.5% per year increase. Average inmate age is increasing, as are both the number and rate of inmate deaths. Aging inmates experience health concerns typical of the general, free, aging population. Inmates have higher incidence of health complications associated with various circumstances, risk behaviors, and associated medical conditions. These circumstances include prison violence, incarceration-related constraints on exerci… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
(3 reference statements)
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although research has not maintained records of the specific number of facilities with formal hospice services, some have estimated the number of states with hospices to be in the vicinity of 25-with several including California, Texas, and New York having multiple hospices throughout the state (Anno et al, 2004;Linder & Meyers, 2009)-and growth projected to continue well into the 21st century (Hoffman & Dickenson, 2011). In the process, heightened attention is being placed on examining issues such as admission standards, need for interdisciplinary care, narcotics, special privileges, family support, and discharge procedures (Linder & Enders, 2011;Linder, Enders, Craig, Richardson, & Meyers, 2002). It is now well accepted, for example, that administration follow a mixed-model approach to care-pushing for curative treatment and transitioning over to a palliative-based focus only after no improvement to medical statuses can be achieved (Dubler, 1998).…”
Section: Other End-of-life Programmingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although research has not maintained records of the specific number of facilities with formal hospice services, some have estimated the number of states with hospices to be in the vicinity of 25-with several including California, Texas, and New York having multiple hospices throughout the state (Anno et al, 2004;Linder & Meyers, 2009)-and growth projected to continue well into the 21st century (Hoffman & Dickenson, 2011). In the process, heightened attention is being placed on examining issues such as admission standards, need for interdisciplinary care, narcotics, special privileges, family support, and discharge procedures (Linder & Enders, 2011;Linder, Enders, Craig, Richardson, & Meyers, 2002). It is now well accepted, for example, that administration follow a mixed-model approach to care-pushing for curative treatment and transitioning over to a palliative-based focus only after no improvement to medical statuses can be achieved (Dubler, 1998).…”
Section: Other End-of-life Programmingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…21 By extension, Linder and colleagues argue that hospice care should be standard treatment for terminally-ill prisoners because hospice care has been the standard of quality health care for those who are terminally-ill in the community since the 1970s. 15 Terminally-ill patients may experience social abandonment or personal isolation that comes when friends and acquaintances stop visiting them because of an inability to cope with issues of death, a lack of knowledge about what to say or do, or simply a lack of awareness of what the patients are experiencing. Hospice care tries to fill this gap of diminished social support, a concern that is ever greater for those in prison who have either lost contact with friends and family or who have little contact because of limited visitation opportunities in prison.…”
Section: Prison Health Care and Hospice In Historical Perspectivementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since the widespread introduction of highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) nationally and the introduction of chemoprophylaxis of opportunistic infections (OIs), mortality among prisoners has markedly decreased7 and HIV/AIDS is no longer the leading cause of prison-related death nationally 32. Excellent adherence to HAART suppresses HIV viral load and increases CD4 cells, thereby keeping HIV-infected persons healthy and free from complications from HIV and non-HIV–associated complications 33, 34.…”
Section: Re-entry Of Hiv-infected Prisoners To the Communitymentioning
confidence: 99%