2001
DOI: 10.1007/s001340101050
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hormones in the critically ill patient: to intervene or not to intervene?

Abstract: Critically ill patients show a variety of hormonal changes that appear to differ considerably in acute and prolonged critical illness. Whether these endocrine alterations serve as physiological adaptation or contribute to further deterioration remains an intriguing question. We review the recent literature and discuss whether measuring circulating hormone concentrations, performing stimulation tests, and intervening with hormone substitution could contribute to the recovery of critically ill patients.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
25
0
2

Year Published

2002
2002
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
25
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…We were not able to perform ACTH stimulation testing, nor were we able to confirm a laboratory diagnosis of adrenal dysfunction with a clinical response to a trial of corticosteroid therapy. The use of ACTH stimulation testing to diagnose adrenal dysfunction in critically ill patients is controversial (7,24,28). Because critical illness itself may result in maximal adrenal stimulation, such testing may reveal little about the sufficiency of the adrenal response (28).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We were not able to perform ACTH stimulation testing, nor were we able to confirm a laboratory diagnosis of adrenal dysfunction with a clinical response to a trial of corticosteroid therapy. The use of ACTH stimulation testing to diagnose adrenal dysfunction in critically ill patients is controversial (7,24,28). Because critical illness itself may result in maximal adrenal stimulation, such testing may reveal little about the sufficiency of the adrenal response (28).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nine of our patients had cortisol concentrations lower than 150 nmol/l during the study; one of these patients died. Although low-dose corticosteroids appear to be useful in patients with catecholamine-dependent septic shock [28,29,30], there is no evidence that corticosteroid replacement therapy is beneficial in all intensive care patients [31]. This may be because the diagnosis of adrenal insufficiency in critical illness is difficult [31].…”
Section: Patients With Abnormally Low Endocrine Valuesmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Although low-dose corticosteroids appear to be useful in patients with catecholamine-dependent septic shock [28,29,30], there is no evidence that corticosteroid replacement therapy is beneficial in all intensive care patients [31]. This may be because the diagnosis of adrenal insufficiency in critical illness is difficult [31]. Some workers have suggested the concept of a relative adrenal insufficiency [32,33,34] where cortisol concentration becomes elevated in response to critical illness but not to the level required for benefit to the patient.…”
Section: Patients With Abnormally Low Endocrine Valuesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, chronic diseases such as arthritis (Templ et al 1996, Lopez-Calderon et al 1999, parasitism (Elsasser et al 1988) and the chronic phase of critical illness (Ligtenberg et al 2001, Van Den Berghe 2002 are all associated with a decrease in one or more pituitary functions, including somatotropic functions, which results in a catabolic and wasting syndrome state.…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 99%