1979
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4684-3503-0_17
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hormonal and Other Effects of Naltrexone in Normal Men

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
10
1

Year Published

1982
1982
2007
2007

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
1
10
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Naltrex- one, a primarily -receptor antagonist but also acting on ␦ and receptors, undergoes extensive first-pass metabolism and biotransformation and has not been studied as broadly as naloxone in terms of acute neuroendocrine and physiological mechanisms. Although the sample size in the present study was relatively modest, it exceeded the sample sizes in the two previous published studies of HPA response to naltrexone (Farren et al 1999;Volavka et al 1979b) and the results showed reliable and steady increases in ACTH and cortisol levels within two hours of administration. Following the acute peak increases in pituitary-and adrenal-derived ACTH and cortisol, respectively, there were slow declines over the next several hours, which is a likely result of the inherent negative feedback loops involved in normal regulation of the HPA axis.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 55%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Naltrex- one, a primarily -receptor antagonist but also acting on ␦ and receptors, undergoes extensive first-pass metabolism and biotransformation and has not been studied as broadly as naloxone in terms of acute neuroendocrine and physiological mechanisms. Although the sample size in the present study was relatively modest, it exceeded the sample sizes in the two previous published studies of HPA response to naltrexone (Farren et al 1999;Volavka et al 1979b) and the results showed reliable and steady increases in ACTH and cortisol levels within two hours of administration. Following the acute peak increases in pituitary-and adrenal-derived ACTH and cortisol, respectively, there were slow declines over the next several hours, which is a likely result of the inherent negative feedback loops involved in normal regulation of the HPA axis.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 55%
“…The first study (Volavka et al 1979b), conducted in ten normal male subjects, showed that oral naltrexone significantly increased cortisol levels two hours after administration and directionally (but nonsignificantly) increased ACTH levels one hour after administration. However, due to the small sample studied, the power may not have been sufficient to detect differences.…”
Section: We Examined Hpa Axis Response To 50 Mg Oral Naltrexone Compamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, a number of studies have demonstrated that low doses of naloxone and naltrexone may be associated with hypoalgesia (Levine et al 1979;Woolf 1980;Dickenson et al 1981;Kayser and Guilbaud 1981;Ueda et al 1986;Vaccarino et al 1988;1989;Kolaric et al 1999), while still others have demonstrated hypoalgesic responding to more standard doses (Volavka et al 1979;Tassorelli et al 1995;Janssen and Arntz 1997;al'Absi et al 2004). For example, in a design that involved the repeated application of noxious electrocutaneous stimulation to the left ankle (i.e., similar to the pain stimulus applied in the present study), it was observed that a 4 mg dose of naloxone was associated with reduction in pain reports relative to a placebo condition (Janssen and Arntz 1997).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other studies have reported that naloxone has no effect on forearm ischemic pain (Grevert and Goldstein 1977;Grevert et al 1983a;Grevert et al 1983b;Posner and Burke 1985), cold pressor pain (Grevert and Goldstein 1978;McCubbin and Bruehl 1994), or electrocutaneous pain in response to stimulation applied to the finger (Bromm et al 1983), forearm (El-Sobky et al 1976), ear (Stacher et al 1988), or teeth (Ernst et al 1986). Finally, a few studies have suggested that, in some cases, opioid antagonists may actually inhibit pain (Volavka et al 1979;Tassorelli et al 1995;Janssen and Arntz 1997). More recent studies have also either failed to observe effects of opioid blockade on pain (McCubbin and Bruehl 1994;Mikkelsen et al 1999;Bruehl et al 2002;Edwards et al 2004), or have reported that the effects of opioid blockade varied as a function of subgroup membership (Schobel et al 1998;Bruehl and Chung 2006;McCubbin et al 2006).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another study found that nalmefene had no effect on serum prolactin in male rhesus monkeys (Mello et al, 2000), while another group found that nalmefene stimulated prolactin release in normal female rhesus monkeys but not in ovariectomized monkeys (VanVugt et al, 1989b). Naltrexone 50 mg stimulated prolactin release in normal male volunteers, early follicular phase female volunteers, and, following daily dosing for 1 week, in luteal phase female volunteers (Volavka et al, 1979;Mendelson et al, 1986;Gindoff et al, 1988), although, when studied in males, naltrexone 100 mg had no effect on prolactin (Volavka et al, 1979). In an all male study of oral nalmefene 10 mg, mean prolactin levels were not different compared to placebo-or naloxonetreated volunteers (Graves et al, 1993).…”
Section: Prolactin and Mu-and Kappa-opioidergic Drugsmentioning
confidence: 99%