2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.vetmic.2007.01.016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Horizontal transmission of Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis in cattle in an experimental setting: Calves can transmit the infection to other calves

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

9
79
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 92 publications
(88 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
(2 reference statements)
9
79
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The influence of other stress factors such as nutrition or lactation, are described by Windsor and Whittington (2009). Stress factors can contribute to the weakening of cell-mediated immunity, which can lead to shedding of MAP in faeces (van Roermund et al, 2007;Windsor and Whittington, 2009). A combination of stress factors, infective dose of agents and immunological state of an individual animal then determine if exposure leads to infection, regression, recovery or disease .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The influence of other stress factors such as nutrition or lactation, are described by Windsor and Whittington (2009). Stress factors can contribute to the weakening of cell-mediated immunity, which can lead to shedding of MAP in faeces (van Roermund et al, 2007;Windsor and Whittington, 2009). A combination of stress factors, infective dose of agents and immunological state of an individual animal then determine if exposure leads to infection, regression, recovery or disease .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, as naturally infected calves are shedding MAP intermittently and in low amounts (under detection limit), early diagnosis is difficult (Antognoli et al, 2007). Van Roermund et al (2007) suggested a "pattern" for the shedding of MAP by infected calves. According to the study, a peak occurs shortly after MAP intake or infection, than it declines to zero for a relatively long time before increasing again.…”
Section: Culture Examination Of Faecesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast to low-shedding adult animals which have only intermittent contact with young animals, young shedders are intensively mixing with susceptible young animals on most commercial dairies or in heifer-growing facilities [45]. If they are shedding at levels equivalent to low-shedding adults as found in experimentally exposed young animals [41], young calves can potentially contribute more to transmission dynamics than low-shedding adults. In addition to the high rate of contact with other young susceptible calves, our results show an inverse relationship between age at exposure and both duration and likelihood of early shedding.…”
Section: Application Of Findingsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other authors report access of calves less than 6 months of age to adult cows as being a major risk factor for JD transmission [33,34]. As summarized by Mitchell et al [27] calves infected at <3 months of age were able to shed MAP beginning one month after the exposure, posing the risk of calf-to-calf transmission in group housing situations [35]. Furthermore, the source of colostrum and milk has been associated with JD transmission.…”
Section: Etiology and Epidemiologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For JD control, it is recommended to isolate calves from each other until 30 days of age [32]. Mitchell et al [27] showed that most MAP infected calves enter an early shedding period in which they can transmit the bacteria to other calves [35]. Group housing replacement heifers might therefore increase the risk for JD transmission on organic and conventional dairy farms.…”
Section: Calving and Dairy Heifer Managementmentioning
confidence: 99%