1984
DOI: 10.1515/bgsl.1984.1984.106.218
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

HÖREN – LESEN – SEHEN. Buch und Schriftlichkeit im Selbstverständnis der volkssprachlichen literarischen Kultur Deutschlands um 1200

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2
2
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 5 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Instead, this claim can be regarded as a signal of identity, belonging to contemporary lay knightly culture and distinct from the court clerics and those knights who had received a clerical education in Latin (cf. Green 1994: 292; Curschmann 1984: 235). Regardless of Wolfram's supposed analphabetism, it is certain from references within the text that Parzival existed in a written form and in a culture where such texts were expected to be both read aloud and circulated for private reading by individuals, particularly noble women, who enjoyed a higher rate of literacy (cf.…”
Section: The Linguistic and Cultural Context Of Parzivalmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Instead, this claim can be regarded as a signal of identity, belonging to contemporary lay knightly culture and distinct from the court clerics and those knights who had received a clerical education in Latin (cf. Green 1994: 292; Curschmann 1984: 235). Regardless of Wolfram's supposed analphabetism, it is certain from references within the text that Parzival existed in a written form and in a culture where such texts were expected to be both read aloud and circulated for private reading by individuals, particularly noble women, who enjoyed a higher rate of literacy (cf.…”
Section: The Linguistic and Cultural Context Of Parzivalmentioning
confidence: 99%