1996
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-3032.1996.tb00873.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hopkins' ‘host selection principle’, another nail in its coffin

Abstract: Abstract. Adult female parasitoids (Aphidius rhopalosiphi De Stef.) (Hymenoptera: Aphidiidae) reared on the aphid Metopolophium dirhodum (Walk.) (Homoptera: Aphididae) changed their responses to odours of two wheat cultivars (‘Maris Huntsman’ and ‘Rapier’) when the parasitized aphids had been moved from the former to the latter cultivar at various times after parasitization. If the aphids were moved after less than 6 days, the female parasitoids emerging from mummies by then formed on ‘Rapier’ responded posit… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
90
0
1

Year Published

2000
2000
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 167 publications
(95 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
(8 reference statements)
3
90
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…It states that a memory for chemical cues learned during development can be transferred through the pupal stage, affecting the host choice behaviour of the adult insect [22]. Alternative to this pre-imaginal learning, the phenomenon described by Hopkins can also be explained by early imaginal learning of chemical cues that are present at the emergence site of the adult insect [57]. This process was termed 'neo-Hopkins host selection principle' by Jaenike [58].…”
Section: Discussion (A) the Role Of Early Learning For Host Differentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It states that a memory for chemical cues learned during development can be transferred through the pupal stage, affecting the host choice behaviour of the adult insect [22]. Alternative to this pre-imaginal learning, the phenomenon described by Hopkins can also be explained by early imaginal learning of chemical cues that are present at the emergence site of the adult insect [57]. This process was termed 'neo-Hopkins host selection principle' by Jaenike [58].…”
Section: Discussion (A) the Role Of Early Learning For Host Differentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The possibility that the indifference towards wheat baits was caused by rearing the parasitoids on the oat-5, avenae complex can therefore be excluded. This is not necessarily at variance with the chemical legacy hypothesis supported by the findings of van Emden et al (1996). Contact to suitable aphid hosts may provide more recent and thus more important information to the foraging female than the chemical information conveyed through the mummy case from which it had emerged.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 31%
“…In additional tests, we examined if pre-adult or emergence-related host plant experiences can influence parasitoid decisions -as was reported by Wickremasinghe & van Emden (1992) and van Emden et al (1996). Three experiments were therefore repeated with parasitoids that had been reared on the wheat-5, avenae complex for several generations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the Hopkins Host Selection Principle (Hopkins, 1917), which proposed that what an insect ate in its larval stage influenced the adults' choice of host or oviposition site, has largely been discounted (Szentesi & Jermy, 1989;Van Emden et al, 1996;Rojas & Wyatt, 1999;Barron, 2001), there is clear evidence that an adult herbivore's behavior may be influenced by some component of chemical experience associated with the larval host-plant or early adult experience (Jaenike, 1983;Corbet, 1985;Anderson et al, 1995). Our results demonstrate that with predators the behavior of the adult is also influenced by larval feeding experience with chemical defenses in prey.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The role that larval feeding experience in insects has on the behavior of adult insects has been the subject of particularly extensive research and intense debate (e.g., Papaj & Rausher, 1983;Szentesi & Jermy, 1989;Papaj & Prokopy, 1989;Bernays, 1995;Barron, 2001). The effects of previous feeding experience on the subsequent feeding behavior of larval insect herbivores and on the choice of adult oviposition sites by herbivores and by parasitoids has been closely examined (Jermy et al, 1982;Jermy, 1987;Herard et al, 1988;Jaenike, 1983;Corbet, 1985;Szentesi & Jermy, 1989;Bernays & Chapman, 1994;Anderson et al, 1995;Van Emden et al, 1996;Rojas & Wyatt, 1999). However, the influence of larval experience on choice of prey by adult predators has been poorly investigated.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%