2015
DOI: 10.5186/aasfm.2015.4033
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hopf's lemma for a class of singular/degenerate PDE-s

Abstract: Abstract. This paper concerns Hopf's boundary point lemma, in certain C 1,Dini -type domains, for a class of singular/degenerate PDE-s, including p-Laplacian. Using geometric properties of levels sets for harmonic functions in convex rings, we construct sub-solutions to our equations that play the role of a barrier from below. By comparison principle we then conclude Hopf's lemma.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, if for instance u 0 > 0 in Ω or if u 0 ≥ 0 and Ω is regular enough in order to have a Hopf's lemma (for instance C 1,α , cf. [10]), then it is straightforward to verify that ψ is indeed non-zero. The iteration scheme (1.2) was introduced by R. Biezuner, G. Ercole, and E. Martins in [1] who conjectured the limit…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, if for instance u 0 > 0 in Ω or if u 0 ≥ 0 and Ω is regular enough in order to have a Hopf's lemma (for instance C 1,α , cf. [10]), then it is straightforward to verify that ψ is indeed non-zero. The iteration scheme (1.2) was introduced by R. Biezuner, G. Ercole, and E. Martins in [1] who conjectured the limit…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It may not be obvious how to verify that the limiting function ψ is not identically zero. However, if for instance u 0 > 0 in Ω or if u 0 ≥ 0 and Ω is regular enough in order to have a Hopf's lemma (for instance C 1,α , cf [10]…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such a minimal Green function G provides us with a positive p-harmonic function defined in a relative neighbourhood of ∂Ω which will be used in the sequel. Importantly, if ∂Ω is of class C 1,γ with 0 < γ < 1, then G is C 1,α up to the boundary, G(x) = 0 and ∇G(x) = 0 for all x ∈ ∂Ω since the Hopf lemma holds, see [26].…”
Section: ω{X0}mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We believe that Lemma 3.2 is of independent interest since it is proved without the use of the tubular neighbourhood theorem and actually allows to bypass it. We note that the Hopf lemma holds also if ∂Ω is of class C 1,Dini (see, [26]) and this allows to gain some generality as it is explained in Remark 4.2.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…The widening of the class of operators to singular/degenerate ones was made in the papers [KH75], [KH77] and [ABM + 11], while the uniform elliptic operators with unbounded lower order coefficients were studied in [Saf10] and [Naz12] (see also [NU09]). We mention also the publications [Tol83] and [MS15] where the Boundary Point Principle was established for a class of degenerate quasilinear operators including the p-Laplacian.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%