Abstract:One of the central questions surrounding the 2008 presidential election is the role of race in shaping electoral choice among non‐Hispanic whites, and whether race played an equivalent role among Hispanics, whose willingness to vote for an African American candidate was raised as an uncertainty during the primary campaign. The authors argue that, beyond the usual association of racial sentiment with party preference, the effect of Obama's race on the 2008 election is significant, but substantially smaller amon… Show more
“…See Ditonto, Lau, and Sears (2013) for results similar to ours. Segura and Valenzuela's (2010) analysis of vote choice in 2008 yields results that differ somewhat from ours, as they do not use a measure of indifference to black suffering-this measure, as we show, has comparable associations with vote choice across Latinos and non-Hispanic whites. 9.…”
mentioning
confidence: 66%
“…While these studies have made valuable contributions, in some cases the primary goal of these studies is to consider white prejudice against blacks; accordingly, Latino attitudes toward blacks are reported as a secondary result and are not investigated as thoroughly as white attitudes. Among the studies that are more centered on the impact of prejudice among Latinos, the scope is mostly limited to the analysis of a single election (Segura and Valenzuela 2010;Tesler and Sears 2010).…”
Section: Latino Attitudes Toward Blacks: Current Literature and Our Amentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Largely due to an absence of data that provide both high-quality national samples of Latinos and measures of prejudice against blacks, only recently have a handful of studies begun to test empirically the political consequences of prejudice among Latinos (Hutchings 2009;Segura and Valenzuela 2010;Tesler and Sears 2010;Ditonto, Lau, and Sears 2013). While these studies have made valuable contributions, in some cases the primary goal of these studies is to consider white prejudice against blacks; accordingly, Latino attitudes toward blacks are reported as a secondary result and are not investigated as thoroughly as white attitudes.…”
Section: Latino Attitudes Toward Blacks: Current Literature and Our Amentioning
A good deal of scholarship examines the effects of prejudice against blacks on public opinion and vote choice in the United States. Despite producing valuable insights, this research largely ignores the attitudes of Latinos-a critical omission, since Latinos constitute a rapidly growing share of the population. Using two nationally representative survey data sets, we find that the level of racial prejudice is comparable for Latinos and non-Hispanic whites. Equally comparable are associations between prejudice and political preferences: policy opinion and support for Obama in the 2008 presidential election. Our findings suggest that despite demographic changes, efforts to enact policies intended to assist blacks and elect black candidates will continue to be undermined by prejudice. That said, Latinos are more likely than non-Hispanic whites to support policies intended to assist blacks, because Latinos are more Democratic than non-Hispanic whites, more egalitarian, and less committed to the value of limited government.
“…See Ditonto, Lau, and Sears (2013) for results similar to ours. Segura and Valenzuela's (2010) analysis of vote choice in 2008 yields results that differ somewhat from ours, as they do not use a measure of indifference to black suffering-this measure, as we show, has comparable associations with vote choice across Latinos and non-Hispanic whites. 9.…”
mentioning
confidence: 66%
“…While these studies have made valuable contributions, in some cases the primary goal of these studies is to consider white prejudice against blacks; accordingly, Latino attitudes toward blacks are reported as a secondary result and are not investigated as thoroughly as white attitudes. Among the studies that are more centered on the impact of prejudice among Latinos, the scope is mostly limited to the analysis of a single election (Segura and Valenzuela 2010;Tesler and Sears 2010).…”
Section: Latino Attitudes Toward Blacks: Current Literature and Our Amentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Largely due to an absence of data that provide both high-quality national samples of Latinos and measures of prejudice against blacks, only recently have a handful of studies begun to test empirically the political consequences of prejudice among Latinos (Hutchings 2009;Segura and Valenzuela 2010;Tesler and Sears 2010;Ditonto, Lau, and Sears 2013). While these studies have made valuable contributions, in some cases the primary goal of these studies is to consider white prejudice against blacks; accordingly, Latino attitudes toward blacks are reported as a secondary result and are not investigated as thoroughly as white attitudes.…”
Section: Latino Attitudes Toward Blacks: Current Literature and Our Amentioning
A good deal of scholarship examines the effects of prejudice against blacks on public opinion and vote choice in the United States. Despite producing valuable insights, this research largely ignores the attitudes of Latinos-a critical omission, since Latinos constitute a rapidly growing share of the population. Using two nationally representative survey data sets, we find that the level of racial prejudice is comparable for Latinos and non-Hispanic whites. Equally comparable are associations between prejudice and political preferences: policy opinion and support for Obama in the 2008 presidential election. Our findings suggest that despite demographic changes, efforts to enact policies intended to assist blacks and elect black candidates will continue to be undermined by prejudice. That said, Latinos are more likely than non-Hispanic whites to support policies intended to assist blacks, because Latinos are more Democratic than non-Hispanic whites, more egalitarian, and less committed to the value of limited government.
“…Others have found significant evidence of hostile attitudes toward Blacks and policies targeting Blacks among Latinos (e.g., Gay, ; Kaufmann, ; Lopez & Pantoja, ; McClain, ) and that Latinos see themselves as having more in common with Whites than Blacks (McClain et al., ). On the other hand, Latinos and African Americans have been shown to have similar policy beliefs and ideological positions (Hero & Preuhs, ; Kaufmann, ), and work by both Barreto, Segura, and Valenzuela () and Segura and Valenzuela () find that racial sentiments played little role in determining Latinos' attitudes toward Obama and vote choice in 2008.…”
In 2008, ANES included for the first time—along with standard explicit measures of old‐fashioned and symbolic racism—the Affect Misattribution Procedure (AMP), a relatively new implicit measure of racial attitudes. This article examines the extent to which four different measures of racial prejudice (three explicit and one implicit) predict public opinion during and after the 2008 election, including Americans' views towards several racial policy issues, their evaluations of, and feelings toward, Barack Obama, and their attitudes toward a Black president in general. Oversamples of African American and Latino respondents in the 2008 ANES enable us to broaden our tests of these measures beyond traditional White samples. We find that racial prejudice played an important role for all racial/ethnic groups but that the traditional explicit measures of racism are by far the stronger predictors for all of our dependent variables (compared to the new implicit measure) for both White and Black respondents. Surprisingly, the AMP adds clear explanatory power only to models in the Latino sample.
“…Segura and Valenzuela (2010) showed that Racial Resentment had a significant, negative effect on Obama's candidacy. Similarly, Pasek et al (2009) concluded that anti-African American racism reduced Obama's vote share (see also Redlawsk et al 2010).…”
Health care has been a contentious issue in American politics for decades, and scholars are beginning to understand the reasons behind public support for, and opposition to, healthcare reform. Using national survey data, we measure the impact of various racial attitudes, including Racial Resentment and Ethnocentrism, on white support for healthcare reform. We measure participants' attitudes across a range of important dimensions of healthcare reform and examine a randomized experiment with a control group that frames legislation as ''recent'' healthcare reform and a treatment condition that frames legislation as ''President Obama's'' healthcare reform. The findings demonstrate that racial attitudes and Ethnocentrism continue to play a role in both support and opposition to healthcare reform.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.