Hope Measurement

Rose, Sage; Sieben, Nicole

doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199399314.013.7

Cited by 7 publications

(4 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Although several studies have demonstrated that trait hope has benefits for parents, domain-specific measures of hope may be more sensitive measures of change resulting from hope-based interventions (Rose & Seiben, 2018). The results of this study provide initial support for the reliability and validity of the HFPS, which measures domain-specific hope for parenting.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Rose and Sieben (2018) suggested that domain-specific measures of hope may be more sensitive measures of change resulting from hope-based interventions and encouraged additional research into their utility. Sympson’s (1999) Domain-Specific Hope Scale was developed to examine hope within a variety of interpersonal and achievement-oriented contexts including relationships, work, and academics.…”

Section: Hopementioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Development and validation of the Hope for Parenting Scale.

Cole

Ingram

Dye

et al. 2021

Couple and Family Psychology: Research and Practice

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The current project aimed to develop and validate the Hope for Parenting Scale (HFPS), a five-item self-report instrument that addresses hopeful thinking of parents. In Sample 1, 413 fathers of infants completed the HFPS. In Sample 2, 290 mothers and fathers of children age 0-18 completed the HFPS. Exploratory factor analyses were conducted using Sample 1 and the single factor solution suggested by EFA item loadings was examined using confirmatory factor analysis with Sample 2. Convergent validity was established via significant correlations to criterion measures of trait hope and paternal involvement with infants. Discriminant validity was established through significant correlations to a measure of depression, anxiety, and stress. Implications and suggestions for future research are discussed.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Hopementioning

confidence: 99%

Development and validation of the Hope for Parenting Scale.

Cole

Ingram

Dye

et al. 2021

Couple and Family Psychology: Research and Practice

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…In the current sample, a coefficient alpha of .75 was obtained for agency and .69 for pathways. Support for construct validity for the Hope Scale has been shown through positive correlations with measures of optimism, self-actualization, and self-esteem, and negative correlations with self-consciousness, hopelessness, depression, and suicidal ideation (for a full review of the Adult Hope Scale and its psychometric properties, see Rose & Sieben, 2018).…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Hope as a Moderator of Intimate Partner Violence and Suicide Risk Behaviors Among Latinas

Edwards,

Torres,

Lewis

et al. 2023

Violence Against Women

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The current study investigated the role of hope in the relationship between intimate partner violence (IPV) and suicide risk behaviors among a community sample of Latinas ( N = 180). Moderation analyses revealed significant interaction effects demonstrating that both aspects of hope—agency and pathways—were associated with suicide risk behaviors at high levels of IPV. Results suggest hope may be helpful when IPV is at low levels, but it may exacerbate suicide risk when high levels of IPV are experienced among Latinas. Future directions and implications are discussed, including the importance of understanding the unique cultural context in which Latina survivors exist.

show abstract

“…The same could be said of Snyder's Adult Dispositional Hope Scale (Snyder et al., 1996). For recent discussions of hope as a psychological construct, see Rose and Sieben (2017), Gallagher, D'Souza, and Richardson (2020).…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Hope: Conceptual and normative issues

Rioux

2021

Philosophy Compass

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Hope is often seen as at once valuable and dangerous: it can fuel our motivation in the face of challenges, but can also distract us from reality and lead us to irrationality. How can we learn to "hope well," and what does "hoping well" involve? Contemporary philosophers disagree on such normative questions about hope and also on how to define hope as a mental state. This article explores recent philosophical debates surrounding the concept of hope and the norms governing hope. It also underlies hope's significance for the philosophy of emotion and the ethics of interpersonal relations. 1 | INTRODUCTION Our hopes are multifarious, ranging from the mundane or the prosaic to the life-shaping or the profound: we hope that it won't rain tomorrow, hope for success in our personal endeavors, hope to be cured from life-threatening diseases, and hope that we will somehow overcome the climate crisis. At bottom, is there anything that sets apart our "deepest" hopes from more superficial ones? Or do all hopes, including even the kind we "invest" in other people, in fact share the same underlying nature? Since hope is often portrayed as both valuable and dangerous, questions about its nature take on special significance. We are indeed often told to "never give up hope"; that "there is always room for hope," while also being warned against the possibility of entraining "false hopes," somehow divorced from reality and potentially leading to disastrous outcomes. But without knowing what hope is, how can we aspire to hope well? And what does "hoping well" even mean? Until quite recently, conceptual and normative questions about hope hadn't received much attention within the analytic tradition. This could be due, as Pettit (2004, p. 54) suggests, to the influence of a conception of hope emerging in the Modern period (notably in the works of Hobbes and Hume), according to which all hope consists in the combination of a desire for an outcome and the belief that outcome is possible but not certain. 1 If all there is to hope is "desire in the context of epistemic uncertainty," 2 then hope might not seem worthy of a standalone philosophical investigation. Attitudes toward hope's philosophical significance have now shifted, however, while hope also figures prominently in current public discourse. 3 This article aims to take stock of these recent philosophical developments. Section 2 turns to descriptive questions about the nature of hope, centering on the relationship between hope, desire, and the emotions, while Section 3 focuses on various evaluative measures used for assessing hope, in

show abstract

Hope Measurement

Cited by 7 publications

References 0 publications

Development and validation of the Hope for Parenting Scale.

Development and validation of the Hope for Parenting Scale.

Hope as a Moderator of Intimate Partner Violence and Suicide Risk Behaviors Among Latinas

Hope: Conceptual and normative issues

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About