2019
DOI: 10.1111/imj.14172
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hope, hype and harms of Big Data

Abstract: Big Data are characterised by greater volumes of data from a greater variety of sources which are produced and processed at greater velocity. Huge digitised datasets from electronic medical records, registries, administrative datasets and genomic databanks can now be analysed by advanced computer programs to reveal patterns, trends and associations previously indiscernible using conventional analytic methods. These new insights may have important implications for clinical care. But Big Data can be limited by i… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
(43 reference statements)
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The limitations of big data analysis (such as missing or duplicate data, poor coding, among others) render large data sets inherently inaccurate. 10 , 14 , 31 Although our study validation was restricted to a retrospective chart review, our overall sensitivity was estimated at 86%. This value is consistent with error rates reported in other studies with large databases, suggesting that these results may closely represent the Portuguese standard of care for PHFs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The limitations of big data analysis (such as missing or duplicate data, poor coding, among others) render large data sets inherently inaccurate. 10 , 14 , 31 Although our study validation was restricted to a retrospective chart review, our overall sensitivity was estimated at 86%. This value is consistent with error rates reported in other studies with large databases, suggesting that these results may closely represent the Portuguese standard of care for PHFs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This value is consistent with error rates reported in other studies with large databases, suggesting that these results may closely represent the Portuguese standard of care for PHFs. 10 , 14 , 31 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Large data sets are well equipped to longitudinally identify disease patterns, risk factors and associations while allowing for inferences on subgroup patient populations. 49 , 50 There may be an association between Dupuytren contracture and trigger finger disease, both in shared pathways of inflammatory physiology and potential precipitating or causative effects.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To date, although 3 report accuracy [ 32 , 33 , 37 ] superior to that of our ensemble approach, these models were restricted to ICU data sets from the United States and China and are, therefore, not generalizable to the general medical and surgical wards of hospitals where UFH is most frequently administered. Furthermore, compared with all existing studies of ML in UFH dosing, ours was the only one, apart from one small external validation in a hemodialysis setting [ 31 , 66 ], to evaluate model performance when applied to new unseen data. External validation is considered an essential step before assessing the efficacy in controlled clinical trials and subsequent implementation in routine practice [ 65 , 67 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%