Hope and therapeutic privilege: time for shared prognosis communication

Abstract

Communicating an unfavourable prognosis while maintaining patient hope represents a critical challenge for healthcare professionals (HPs). Duty requires respect for the right to patient autonomy while at the same time not doing harm by causing hopelessness and demoralisation. In some cases, the need for therapeutic privilege is discussed. The primary objectives of this study were to explore HPs’ perceptions of hope in the prognosis communication and investigate how they interpret and operationalise key ethical principles. Sixteen qualitative semistructured interviews with HPs from different positions and experience, including doctors and nurses in four different departments (intensive care, oncology, palliative care, rehabilitation), were conducted in the Ticino Cantonal Hospital, Switzerland. The interviews were recorded, transcribed verbatim and analysed using thematic analysis. HPs defined prognosis and patient hope as interdependent concepts related to future perspectives for subjective quality of life. Two main factors allow HPs to maximise the benefits and minimise the harm of their communication: respecting the patient’s timing and sharing the patient’s wishes. Time is required to reframe needs and expectations. Furthermore, communication needs to be shared by HPs, patients and their relatives to build common awareness and promote a person-centred approach to prognosis. In this process, interprofessional collaboration is key: doctors and nurses are complementary and can together guarantee that patients and relatives receive information in the most appropriate form when they need it. Organisational aspects and the HPs’ emotional difficulties, particularly in coping with their own despair, are barriers to effective communication that need further investigation.

Physicians' decision‐making when managing pediatric patients with prolonged disorders of consciousness: A qualitative study

“…Unlike our results, this study found that physicians experienced a moral tension between the need to give families the time to grasp the events and the need for fair allocation of resources [20]. Evidence from Ticino highlights physicians' need to find both "enough" time and the "right" time to explain information honestly and efficiently while maintaining the patient's hope [21].…”

Palliative care and its own identity, through an autoethnography: do you recognize these patterns?

“…22 Many physicians mistakenly equated PC and discussing bad news with giving up hope. 23 However, patients with serious illness usually want to hear the truth from their physicians and benefit from knowing the facts, [24][25][26] and the physician can play a valuable role in helping each patient define his hopes. 27 Many doctors confuse the decision to administer therapy in instances of little likely benefit -futile therapy -with the act of providing or preserving hope.…”

Health care professionals’ experiences with goal setting during initial rehabilitation after newly acquired spinal cord injury/ disorder – a qualitative focus group study

“…Some patients need more time than others to understand and accept their new situation. Consequently, an important skill for GS is to accept the patient's journey and pace so that they can slowly reframe their goals into more realistic ones during the course of rehabilitation ( 37 ).…”