2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.adhoc.2013.08.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hop count based distance estimation in mobile ad hoc networks – Challenges and consequences

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
9
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…4,5,[8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17] Algorithms for vehicular networks have also been suggested. 18 The use of methods of either category depends on the application scenario and the network's nodes hardware capabilities. In sensor networks, the simplicity of the nodes is usually demanded and the range-free approach seems more appropriate, since the use of additional hardware is not required.…”
Section: Range Freementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…4,5,[8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17] Algorithms for vehicular networks have also been suggested. 18 The use of methods of either category depends on the application scenario and the network's nodes hardware capabilities. In sensor networks, the simplicity of the nodes is usually demanded and the range-free approach seems more appropriate, since the use of additional hardware is not required.…”
Section: Range Freementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most recent research in the range-free area focuses on improving the accuracy of estimating the distance traveled per hop. The proposed approaches can be categorized as follows: (a) simply using the node range as a rough estimate, 19 (b) finding an estimate for the expected error in localization and using that information to improve performance, 4,9,17,18 (c) heuristically finding an estimate for the distance, 14 (d) using support vector machines, 13 and (e) proposing complex analytical solutions that bound the error of the estimation 8 or any combination of the above methods. A drawback of most of the popular range-free methods (eg, DV-Hop 10,13,14,16,17 ) is the requirement for special nodes, called anchors.…”
Section: Range Freementioning
confidence: 99%
“…La literatura hace referencia a DV-Hop como el algoritmo estándar en la categoría de algoritmos de posicionamiento libres de distancias. El algoritmo DV-Hop emplea el conteo de saltos [22,23,16] como técnica de medición de distancia entre nodos y el método de trilateración [23,16,37] como técnica para estimar la posición de sus nodos. El método tradicional de trilateración es un método empleado para determinar la posición de un punto o nodo 1 .…”
Section: Multilateración Probabilística: Un Nuevo Método De Estimacióunclassified
“…In Euclidean distance-based schemes, nodes have to be equipped with a positioning system like a GPS in order to obtain the Euclidean distance between two nodes [115,69]. Alternatively, as the number of hops is the common metric used by routing protocols to measure the distance between the source node and the destination node [72], this can also be used by the probabilistic broadcast [80] Degree schemes to determine the distance between two nodes. In hints-based schemes, nodes estimate the relative distance between two nodes based on the history of connectivity of the two nodes [17].…”
Section: Adaptive Non-counter-based Schemesmentioning
confidence: 99%