Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Generative Programming and Component Engineering 2012
DOI: 10.1145/2371401.2371420
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Honu

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We discuss the most relevant and modern approaches below. Unlike most extensible language approaches, our work uses S-expressions rather than extensible lexical syntax, but see the work of Rafkind and Flatt [2012] on integrating macros and conventional syntax.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We discuss the most relevant and modern approaches below. Unlike most extensible language approaches, our work uses S-expressions rather than extensible lexical syntax, but see the work of Rafkind and Flatt [2012] on integrating macros and conventional syntax.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…SugarJ [11] provides a method for extending Java syntax. ProteaJ [19], Wyvern [24], and Honu [26] are programming languages that natively support syntax extension. Using these syntax extension mechanisms, domain-specific notation can be embedded as is.…”
Section: Domain-specific Languagementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast to SugarJ and similar to Lisp, Racket [7] and Honu [6] provide facilities for adapting its lexical syntax using reader macro. In Racket, the capability of the syntactically extension is limited to the host language syntax.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%