1993
DOI: 10.12930/0271-9517-13.1.43
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Honors and Nonhonors Freshmen: Demographics, Attitudes, Interests, and Behaviors

Abstract: Demographics, attitudes, interests, and behaviors of honors and nonhonors freshmen were studied. Although similar in extracurricular interests, educational objectives, and some study habits, the two groups reported differences in most other areas. The findings offer implications for advising both groups, such as placing different emphases on format of academic courses, orientation to campus life, and retention strategies.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
14
0

Year Published

1995
1995
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
2
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The minority of honors students in each class did not aspire to earn a postbaccalaureate degree. These findings are consistent with Katchadourian and Boli's (1985) suggestion that many freshmen aspire to receive a doctorate degree, rather than a master's degree as Perrone & Dow (1993) and Gerrity et al (1993) also suggested.…”
Section: Educational Aspirationssupporting
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The minority of honors students in each class did not aspire to earn a postbaccalaureate degree. These findings are consistent with Katchadourian and Boli's (1985) suggestion that many freshmen aspire to receive a doctorate degree, rather than a master's degree as Perrone & Dow (1993) and Gerrity et al (1993) also suggested.…”
Section: Educational Aspirationssupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Gerrity et al (1993) found the same results in their study of honors freshmen. This research suggests honors underclassmen are not likely to aspire to attain a doctorate degree.…”
Section: Educational Aspirationssupporting
confidence: 65%
“…Other findings on this population indicate that high ability students come from advantaged backgrounds (GDA Integrated Services, 2003;Glennen et al, 2000), have college-educated parents (Gerrity, Lawrence, & Sedlacek, 1993), and attend public colleges (Arnold, 1995). Long and Lange (2002) compared honors students to nonhonors students and found that honors students were more conscientious and open to new experiences, asked more questions, discussed grades and academic ideas with a professor, prepared for class, worked for pay on-campus, participated in cocurricular activities, and completed more volunteer community service than did nonhonors students.…”
Section: Characteristics Of High-ability College Studentsmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…The characteristics described in Table 1 suggest that honours students "require a different, more challenging curriculum and other learning opportunities to satisfy [their] drive to learn, know and do" (Achterberg, 2005, p. 81). The literature suggests several educational demands of honours students (Achterberg, 2005;Van Gorp, et al, 2012;Wolfensberger & Offringa, 2012;Scager, et al, 2012b;Wiegant, et al, 2012;Gerrity, et al, 1993;Coppoolse, et al, 2013;Van Eijl, et al, 2007). These can be clustered in: freedom / independence, focus on competence and high expectations, and learning environment (see Table 2 and Table 5 for operationalisation).…”
Section: Educational Demands Of Honours Studentsmentioning
confidence: 99%