Honor as a Motive for Making Sacrifices

Abstract

This article deals with the notion of honor and its relation to the willingness to make sacrifices. There is a widely shared feeling, especially in Western countries, that the willingness to make sacrifices for the greater good has been on a reverse trend for quite a while both on the individual and the societal levels, and that this is increasingly problematic to the military. First of all, an outline of what honor is will be given. After that, the Roman honor-ethic, stating that honor is a necessary incentive for courageous behavior and that it is something worth dying for, is contrasted with today's ruling view in the West, which sees honor as something obsolete and archaic and not as a legitimate motive for courageous behavior. The article then addresses the way honor continues to have a role in today's military, despite its diminishing role in Western society at large.

Violent Radicalism and the Psychology of Prepossession

“…Typically, societies pay homage to, and glorify those who are ready to make sacrifices on their behalf. For instance, military service that reflects soldiers' readiness to risk life and limb for "king and country" has been universally regarded as a most honorable pursuit (Olsthoorn, 2005). Thus, even though violence isn't significancebestowing necessarily-it often is so actually and in light of the ubiquity of intergroup conflict in human history.…”

Moral autonomy in Australian legislation and military doctrine

“…Connected to assumptions of personal excellence and moral responsibility, military service is saturated with stoic notions of integrity: 'more or less on the same plane as conscience, [which] presupposes moral autonomy'. 60 But these ideas are muffled by conventional argument that soldiers be unmindful of the cause and merely do as they are told. The logic of the Australian legislativeÁ doctrinal convention coincides with the argument of Walzer who argues:…”

Honor War Theory: Romance or Reality?

“…Sometimes they note that JWT supplanted, if not an articulated theory of moral war, at least an 'ethos' that had a great deal to say about when and how to fight (Bonadonna 2010;French 2003;Lebow 2010;Olsthoorn 2005;Robinson 2006 and2007, among others). 1 Nonetheless, all too often the gestures made in the direction of this older ethos misrepresent it or downplay its perennial intuitiveness as 'romantic.'…”