Honor Among Thieves: Understanding Rhetorical and Material Cooperation Among Violent Nonstate Actors

Abstract

Cooperation among militant organizations contributes to capability but also presents security risks. This is particularly the case when organizations face substantial repression from the state. As a consequence, for cooperation to emerge and persist when it is most valuable, militant groups must have means of committing to cooperation even when the incentives to defect are high. We posit that shared ideology plays this role by providing community monitoring, authority structures, trust, and transnational networks. We test this theory using new, expansive, time-series data on relationships between militant organizations from 1950 to 2016, which we introduce here. We find that when groups share an ideology, and especially a religion, they are more likely to sustain material cooperation in the face of state repression. These findings contextualize and expand upon research demonstrating that connections between violent nonstate actors strongly shape their tactical and strategic behavior.

Delegation, Sponsorship, and Autonomy: An Integrated Framework for Understanding Armed Group–State Relationships

“…At the cross-national level, new, more granular data sources can enable better analysis of armed groups' relationships with states and with each other (Blair et al 2021;Otto, Scharpf, and Gohdes 2020;Powell and Florea 2021). While I have advanced a general framework, however, with any armed group-state relationship-as with conflict resolution and peacebuilding efforts more broadly (Autesserre 2017)-careful, contextualized analysis is necessary for policy or practitioner responses to make the most of both local and international knowledge and resources.…”

Gateways to White Nationalism: Leaders’ Strategic Online Rhetoric and Follower Engagement

“…For example, many re-cruited members of extremist groups ultimately end up holding 'practical ideologies' that may only loosely resemble published organizational doctrine, but nonetheless serve to foster internal group cohesion among militants who might otherwise disagree on specific components of ideological doctrine (Parkinson 2021). These shared ideological beliefs also help foster and sustain cooperation across like-minded organizations (Blair et al 2022), which may be particularly important for more decentralized extremist movements.…”

Restitution or Retribution? Detainee Payments and Insurgent Violence

“…17.Spatial autocorrelation could result from, for instance, alliances between militant cells across districts (Blair, Horowitz and Potter 2022; Blair et al 2022). …”