2014
DOI: 10.1080/07294360.2014.890565
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hong Kong tertiary students' conceptions of assessment of academic ability

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
11
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
1
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As Biggs and Watkins (2001) found, Chinese students' motivation was influenced by external factors such as rewards, parents, etc. Similarly, this finding has been shown in other studies where Chinese university students reported that parent expectations were important to them (Peterson et al 2013;Wang and Brown 2014). It is also worth noting that English language learning has been associated with students' beliefs of upward social mobility in the Chinese context (Liu et al 2016;Pan and Block 2011).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…As Biggs and Watkins (2001) found, Chinese students' motivation was influenced by external factors such as rewards, parents, etc. Similarly, this finding has been shown in other studies where Chinese university students reported that parent expectations were important to them (Peterson et al 2013;Wang and Brown 2014). It is also worth noting that English language learning has been associated with students' beliefs of upward social mobility in the Chinese context (Liu et al 2016;Pan and Block 2011).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…Another thing to put into account is assessment should not be a strict control system whch constrains the students autonomy (Z. Wang & Brown, 2014).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Reading of the papers excluded seven papers that were reviews (Brown, 2011;Double et al, 2020;McMillan, 2016McMillan, , 2019Van der Kleij & Lipnevich, 2021;Vogl & Pekrun, 2016, Wise & Smith, 2016, five that had no measure of student perceptions of assessment (Babaii & Adeh, 2019;Chen & Lin, 2020;Gordienko, 2015;Natsis et al, 2018;Taghizadeh & Kazemzadeh, 2019), one was a content analysis of syllabi (Panadero et al, 2019), two were qualitative analysis of student drawings (Brown & Wang, 2013;Wang & Brown, 2014), and two were qualitative analysis of student comments (Cleland, & Walton, 2012;Murillo & Hidalgo, 2017). Unfortunately, two studies cited the SCoA but instead used the Teacher Conceptions of Assessment inventory (Brown, 2003) to do comparative studies between faculty and students (Fletcher et al, 2012;Hodgson & Garvey, 2020).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…was a content analysis of syllabi (Panadero et al, 2019), two were qualitative analysis of student drawings (Brown & Wang, 2013;Wang & Brown, 2014), and two were qualitative analysis of student comments (Cleland, & Walton, 2012;Murillo & Hidalgo, 2017). Unfortunately, two studies cited the SCoA but instead used the Teacher Conceptions of Assessment inventory (Brown, 2003) to do comparative studies between faculty and students (Fletcher et al, 2012;Hodgson & Garvey, 2020).…”
Section: Brownmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation