2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.actaastro.2010.05.021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Honeycomb vs. foam: Evaluating potential upgrades to ISS module shielding

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 62 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Cellular materials are also distinct from porous materials which are composed of isolated pores and have relatively low porosity (<70%) [1]. Cellular materials can be categorised Cellular materials are attractive for many engineering applications with regard to their mechanical, thermal, acoustic and electromagnetic properties, among which the applications for energy absorption and load attenuation have been continuously increased in transport, aerospace, defence, building and biomedical industries [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11]. When they are used to absorb energy or mitigate impact/blast loads, their compressive properties, under both quasi-static and dynamic conditions, are of particular importance.…”
Section: Accepted Manuscriptmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cellular materials are also distinct from porous materials which are composed of isolated pores and have relatively low porosity (<70%) [1]. Cellular materials can be categorised Cellular materials are attractive for many engineering applications with regard to their mechanical, thermal, acoustic and electromagnetic properties, among which the applications for energy absorption and load attenuation have been continuously increased in transport, aerospace, defence, building and biomedical industries [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11]. When they are used to absorb energy or mitigate impact/blast loads, their compressive properties, under both quasi-static and dynamic conditions, are of particular importance.…”
Section: Accepted Manuscriptmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, in an experimental study presented by NASA [1], foam-core sandwich panels (FCSPs) with 25-30% lower areal density than HCSPs demonstrated better ballistic performance. In [2], it was determined that, depending on impact conditions, doublelayer foam shields provided from 3 to 15% improvement in critical projectile diameter as compared to double-layer honeycomb shields of similar weight. The performance improvement in case of using the foams was not explained only as a result of the simple absence of cells that "channel" the fragment cloud.…”
Section: Imentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1,2,15) There have been some studies about oblique impacts. [10][11][12][13][14][16][17][18] Ryan et al 16) derived a ballistic limit equation for the metallic opencell foam configuration in oblique impacts. They also characterized failure limits of Whipple shield made of an aluminum alloy in oblique impacts.…”
Section: Problem Statement and Research Objectivesmentioning
confidence: 99%