Plant Breeding Reviews 1995
DOI: 10.1002/9780470650059.ch3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Honeycomb Selection Designs

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
176
0
36

Year Published

1996
1996
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 130 publications
(213 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
1
176
0
36
Order By: Relevance
“…Among the selected populations there was a trend for MhS and PhS(CC) to produce more DM than PhS. it seems that the mass honeycomb selection (Fasoulas & Fasoula 1995) was efficient for this broad-based population of D. glomerata, which had not previously undergone any further selection procedure. Generally, mass selection is considered a useful tool at the first stages of selection programs for improving biomass production of forage grasses (Sleper 1987).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Among the selected populations there was a trend for MhS and PhS(CC) to produce more DM than PhS. it seems that the mass honeycomb selection (Fasoulas & Fasoula 1995) was efficient for this broad-based population of D. glomerata, which had not previously undergone any further selection procedure. Generally, mass selection is considered a useful tool at the first stages of selection programs for improving biomass production of forage grasses (Sleper 1987).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…A broad-based population of D. glomerata was evaluated for DM production during winter, from which 10 superior plants were selected using three different procedures: (a) the 10 best plants using mass honeycomb selection (moving-ring selection) (MhS) (Fasoulas & Fasoula 1995), (b) the 10 best plants using pedigree honeycomb selection (the best two plants from each of the best five families) (PHS), and (c) the 10 best plants by pedigree honeycomb selection using the combined criterion CC = x\\ -CV)/CV that selects jointly for high family mean (x) and reduced family coefficient of variation (CV) (Fasoulas & Fasoula 1995) (PhS(CC)). From each of the best five families on the basis of CC, the two highest yielding plants were finally selected.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Selection was performed in honeycomb selection designs, which allow the individual plants to express their full genetic potential (Fasoulas & Fasoula, 1995) for five cycles. A total of six high-yielding open-pollinated lines of the 5 th cycle (C4) have been selected on the basis of the two prognostic equations (Fasoula, 2006) with selection intensity near 1%.…”
Section: Plant Materialsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Honeycomb breeding and designs, maximize phenotypic expression and differentiation under nil-competition conditions, weakening also soil heterogeneity effects, and thus, resulting in selection of superior individual plants (Fasoulas & Fasoula, 1995;Fasoulas, 1988). This way, plants are enabled to express their full genetic potential for tillering, yielding capacity, robust root systems and full phenotypic expression.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Each plot corresponded to a specific plant density and consisted of single-plant hills and included at least 260 of the population and 100 of the control cultivar. Four of the plots were established according to the non-replicated-0 (NR-0) honeycomb design (Fasoulas & Fasoula, 1995), with interplant distances of 1.0, 0.8, 0.6 and 0.4 m. The corresponding densities were 1.15, 1.80, 3.20 and 7.22 . In each plot, plants of the population and the control cultivar were sown at separate rows (e.g., the 1.15 plants m -2 plot consisted of 16 rows involving only the population and of six rows consisting solely of the control cultivar).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%