2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2019.109684
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Honey botanical origin classification using hyperspectral imaging and machine learning

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
22
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 163 publications
0
22
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, deep learning models usually reply on heavy computation source and long training time, which seem inefficient for our specific problem. This may also explain why many food inspection works [17,18,[20][21][22] prefer to use conventional machine learning models rather than deep learning. 2) After introducing the background as another class per your constructive suggestion, more misclassification cases occur inevitably, leading to degraded OA, KP and average accuracy (AA) of our proposed method which are reduced from 98.32%, 98.26% and 98.32% to 97.32%, 95.86% and 93.73%, respectively.…”
Section: ) Extended Experiments On Background Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In addition, deep learning models usually reply on heavy computation source and long training time, which seem inefficient for our specific problem. This may also explain why many food inspection works [17,18,[20][21][22] prefer to use conventional machine learning models rather than deep learning. 2) After introducing the background as another class per your constructive suggestion, more misclassification cases occur inevitably, leading to degraded OA, KP and average accuracy (AA) of our proposed method which are reduced from 98.32%, 98.26% and 98.32% to 97.32%, 95.86% and 93.73%, respectively.…”
Section: ) Extended Experiments On Background Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent years, a wide range of machine learning algorithms have been successfully applied for HSI based food quality inspection and grading applications. Noviyanto et al [17] proposed a multi-stage model including noisy band elimination, spectral normalization and hierarchical classification, to classify the honey botanical origin with the k-nearest neighbor (KNN) and support vector machine (SVM) classifiers. Erkinbaev et al [18] built an artificial neural network (ANN) to predict wheat hardness from HSI data.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A promising quick, automatic, and non-invasive approach for honey botanical origin classification was developed using a combination of VIS/NIR hyperspectral imaging and machine learning, namely SVM and k-NN [24]. The developed techniques include noisy band elimination, spectral normalization, and hierarchical classification.…”
Section: Honey and Other Products Of Animal Originmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The number of scientific works regarding the use of spectroscopy for food authenticity increased from 134 papers during 2010–2014 to 369 papers during 2015–2019 ( Figure 3 a), while the number of total citations ( Figure 3 b) doubled during the last five years (20,784 citations between 2015 and 2019 versus 9666 citations between 2010 and 2014). Some examples of recent applications of spectroscopic techniques for authentication of food products of animal origin include detection of adulteration in meat [ 14 , 15 ] identification of milk species [ 16 , 17 ], detection of thawed muscle foods [ 18 , 19 ] identification of muscle foods species [ 20 , 21 , 22 ], and determination of the botanical origin of honey [ 23 , 24 ], among many others.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…e results showed that the method was effective on melon's cracking identification. Noviyanto and Abdulla [43] reported the use of similar classification algorithm called the k nearest neighbor (kNN) clustering to classify honey botanical origin with around 83% accuracy and 2.6% standard deviation. Cordella et al [18] investigated indirect honey adulteration from 10 to 40% using several bee-feeding sugar syrups.…”
Section: K-means Clusteringmentioning
confidence: 99%