2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.ymgme.2010.11.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Homozygous familial hypercholesterolemia in Lebanon: A genotype/phenotype correlation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
25
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Danish and Norwegian data suggest an even higher prevalence rate of between 1 in 200 and 1 in 300 (9,10). In some populations HeFH prevalence is extremely high as a result of founder effects (increased frequency of a genetic abnormality in an isolated population) (11)(12)(13)(14)(15).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Danish and Norwegian data suggest an even higher prevalence rate of between 1 in 200 and 1 in 300 (9,10). In some populations HeFH prevalence is extremely high as a result of founder effects (increased frequency of a genetic abnormality in an isolated population) (11)(12)(13)(14)(15).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The classical HoFH prevalence is 1:1 000 000, 1 with higher rates in genetically isolated populations, such as French Canadians, Afrikaners from South Africa, or Christian Lebanese people. [10][11][12][13] However, recent publications showed that the true prevalence may be higher, with estimated HoFH prevalences of 1:160 000 in Denmark, 14 1:300 000 in the Netherlands, 15 and 1:800 000 in Germany. 16 Additionally, a recent document from the Spanish Atherosclerosis Society refers to 44 genetically confirmed cases in Spain.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In some geographic areas owing to a founder effect, the prevalence is higher: one in 30,000 in South Africa, one in 275,000 in Quebec, one in 100,000 in Lebanon and one in 171,167 in a Japan district [6][7][8][9]. Recent studies suggest a frequency as high as one in 200 for HeFH and this implies that it may be an underestimation of diagnosis in the general population, and the prevalence of HoFH may be higher than p reviously thought [10,11].…”
Section: Overview Of the Available Treatments For Hofhmentioning
confidence: 99%