2018
DOI: 10.4310/hha.2018.v20.n1.a20
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Homotopy theory of symmetric powers

Abstract: We introduce the symmetricity notions of symmetric h-monoidality, symmetroidality, and symmetric flatness. As shown in our paper arXiv:1410.5675, these properties lie at the heart of the homotopy theory of colored symmetric operads and their algebras. In particular, they allow one to equip categories of algebras over operads with model structures and to show that weak equivalences of operads induce Quillen equivalences of categories of algebras. We discuss these properties for elementary model categories such … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
55
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(59 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
1
55
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It does not apply to chain complexes of abelian groups, and in fact the commutative operad is provably not admissible in this category. Moreover, as was shown in , symmetric h‐monoidality (and similarly with symmetroidality and symmetric flatness) are stable under transfer and monoidal left Bousfield localizations, which allows to easily promote these properties from basic model categories to more advanced model categories, such as spectra. The latter are shown in to be symmetric h‐monoidal, symmetroidal, and symmetric flat.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 83%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It does not apply to chain complexes of abelian groups, and in fact the commutative operad is provably not admissible in this category. Moreover, as was shown in , symmetric h‐monoidality (and similarly with symmetroidality and symmetric flatness) are stable under transfer and monoidal left Bousfield localizations, which allows to easily promote these properties from basic model categories to more advanced model categories, such as spectra. The latter are shown in to be symmetric h‐monoidal, symmetroidal, and symmetric flat.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…In § 2, we recall the symmetricity properties introduced in : symmetric h‐monoidality, symmetroidality, and symmetric flatness, and a few other basic notions on model categories. As was shown in [, 5.7, 5.8, 6.4, 6.5], these properties are stable transfer and monoidal Bousfield localizations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast, our result will place no hypothesis on the maps in C at all, beyond our standing hypothesis that these maps are cofibrations. We additionally remark that the preprint [PS15] has independently considered the question of when Bousfield localization preserves the monoid axiom, towards the goal of rectification results in general categories of spectra.…”
Section: Bousfield Localization and The Monoid Axiommentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The following basic assumption ensures, in particular, that the forgetful functor from O-algebras to the underlying category of R-modules preserves cofibrant objects; see, for instance, [26,28,33]. Recall from [18] that associated to the operad O is the tower of operads…”
Section: Nilpotent Structured Ring Spectramentioning
confidence: 99%