2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2005.07.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Homotopy and heterotopy and the bilateral field advantage in the Dimond paradigm

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…9 According to the known histologic pattern of the CC, through-CC cortical presentations (homotopic stimulations) yielded faster reaction times than heterotopic stimulations. 10 Given extensive axonal degeneration and atrophy within the CC in MS, structural connectivity–related homotopy changes are likely. DTI has been particularly useful in determining the microstructural axonal degeneration in white matter tracts such as the CC by use of quantitative scalar indices such as mean diffusivity and FA.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…9 According to the known histologic pattern of the CC, through-CC cortical presentations (homotopic stimulations) yielded faster reaction times than heterotopic stimulations. 10 Given extensive axonal degeneration and atrophy within the CC in MS, structural connectivity–related homotopy changes are likely. DTI has been particularly useful in determining the microstructural axonal degeneration in white matter tracts such as the CC by use of quantitative scalar indices such as mean diffusivity and FA.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They predicted that placing two stimuli to be discriminated in an oblique rather than a horizontal axis (relative to the meridian) on a computer screen (see Figure 1 for an illustration) should present a cost in RT significantly greater in bilateral stimulation conditions (requiring inter-hemispheric integration) than in unilateral stimulation conditions (not requiring inter-hemispheric integration). They obtained precisely that pattern, significantly, in two distinct experiments (Braun et al, 2011, Experiment 1;Desjardins & Braun, 2006). Stated more technically, the interaction between bilateral/unilateral stimulation and horizontal/oblique stimulus-pair location, relative to the meridian, was significant, as predicted.…”
Section: Callosal Homotopymentioning
confidence: 72%
“…The first has been termed the callosal homotopy mechanism by Desjardins et al (2006) and was supported by the appropriate interaction of Bilateral/Unilateral Stimulation and Stimulus Pair Axis Orientation, significant as predicted in both experiments. This demonstrates that the idea of this mechanism is supported with stimuli having no intrinsic orientation (Experiment 1) and with full balancing of any kind of orientation of the fixation stimulus, the target stimuli and the stimulus fields or quadrants (Experiment 2).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 86%
See 2 more Smart Citations