1988
DOI: 10.1039/f19888402545
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Homotactic and heterotactic interactions in aqueous solutions containing some saccharides. Experimental results and an empirical relationship between saccharide solvation and solute–solute interactions

Abstract: The enthalpies of dilution of binary and ternary aqueous solutions at 25 "C containing the isomeric disaccharides cellobiose, maltose and trehalose have been investigated. The considerable variation in the enthalpic second virial coefficients appears to be related to the tendency the molecules have to hydrogen bond to the solvent, and using the results obtained, in association with literature information for other saccharide-containing systems, it is shown that a reasonable correlation can be obtained between … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
6
3

Year Published

1990
1990
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
2
6
3
Order By: Relevance
“…However, in sucrose, intramolecular HBs are present (57) thus leaving an overall lower number of sites available to HB with the surrounding. At variance, in agreement with the large number of coordination water molecules present in its (pentahydrate) crystalline state (58), raffinose directly binds a larger fraction of water molecules than the other sugars (59), as confirmed also by the r A value for sample 2 R .…”
Section: Water-protein-sugar Interactionssupporting
confidence: 63%
“…However, in sucrose, intramolecular HBs are present (57) thus leaving an overall lower number of sites available to HB with the surrounding. At variance, in agreement with the large number of coordination water molecules present in its (pentahydrate) crystalline state (58), raffinose directly binds a larger fraction of water molecules than the other sugars (59), as confirmed also by the r A value for sample 2 R .…”
Section: Water-protein-sugar Interactionssupporting
confidence: 63%
“…The efficiency of trehalose may be due to its ability in forming glassy structures in a wide hydration range, along with the hydrogen bond capability. However, this is not consistent with results on raffinose, which is less effective than other sugars [9], although it has a glass transition temperature comparable with that of trehalose, along with larger hydrogen bonding potential [10]. An approach based on structural studies of trehalosewater binary systems, proposes that the polymorphism of trehalose both in the crystalline and amorphous states is at the basis of its effectiveness [11].…”
Section: Introductioncontrasting
confidence: 41%
“…Actually, trehalose was found more effective than other disaccharides at high temperatures, when direct interactions between the sugar and the biomolecule should play a stronger role. However, this model cannot explain results on raffinose [27]: this sugar is less-effective, despite having a Tg similar to trehalose, and an even larger hydrogen bonding capability [28]. It has also been shown that glass formation alone does not provide the best suppression of protein motions: either liquid or glassy glycerol provides stronger effects than glassy trehalose at low temperature, while trehalose appears most effective at high temperatures [29].…”
Section: The Trehalose Peculiaritymentioning
confidence: 73%