2013
DOI: 10.1007/s11135-013-9915-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Homophily and heterophily in personal networks. From mutual acquaintance to relationship intensity

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, there are systems which behave in opposite manner, where their components preferentially choose to connect themselves to others with some distinct inner characteristics [3]. In fact, Nature seems to favor the former or the later construction, which we respectively call Similar or Dissimilar (neighborhood) patterns, to achieve different agendas [4]. This article explores ideas inspired by these scenarios within the non-identical phase oscillator Kuramoto model with local mean field coupling, which is one of the main paradigms to describe collective behavior and synchronization [5].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, there are systems which behave in opposite manner, where their components preferentially choose to connect themselves to others with some distinct inner characteristics [3]. In fact, Nature seems to favor the former or the later construction, which we respectively call Similar or Dissimilar (neighborhood) patterns, to achieve different agendas [4]. This article explores ideas inspired by these scenarios within the non-identical phase oscillator Kuramoto model with local mean field coupling, which is one of the main paradigms to describe collective behavior and synchronization [5].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Taking into account that the data did not meet the criteria of normality and homoscedasticity, we proceeded with the non-parametric Kruskal-Wallis analysis to identify whether there are significant differences in the three clusters detected as a function of the level of empowerment, using the values of the full ordinal scale for this analysis. This analysis did not show significant values, even with the time of relocation in the target community, but it did show significant values as a function of the age of the alters ( χ 2 = 56,214; p = 0.000), a situation that can be considered normal considering the principle of homophily ( McPherson et al, 2001 ), according to which people tend to establish substantive relationships with people of a similar age ( Lozares et al, 2014 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…The opposite, where individuals relate to those with different characteristics is called heterophily and is seen in some social networks; for example, see Lozares et al (2014).…”
Section: Discussion and Future Workmentioning
confidence: 99%