2019
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-34621-8_17
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Homomorphic Encryption for Finite Automata

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
23
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The inhomogeneous NTRU (decision) problem (iNTRU) introduced in [6] consists in distinguishing between a random and a synthetically constructed (ℓ+1)-tuple.…”
Section: Contribution 1: Breaking the Integer Intru Assumptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The inhomogeneous NTRU (decision) problem (iNTRU) introduced in [6] consists in distinguishing between a random and a synthetically constructed (ℓ+1)-tuple.…”
Section: Contribution 1: Breaking the Integer Intru Assumptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After introducing the one dimensional version of the inhomogeneous NTRU problem, the authors of [6] generalize it to matrices. The matrix inhomogeneous NTRU (decision) problem (MiNTRU) consists in distinguishing between a randomly sampled and a synthetically constructed matrix.…”
Section: Contribution 2: Generalizing the One-dimensional Attack To Thementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Additional developments include a somewhat homomorphic variation on the GSΩ scheme presented by Genise et al [97]. This scheme uses an inhomogeneous variant of the NTRU assumption (iNTRU) for security, a stronger assumption than LΩE.…”
Section: Implementation and Standardizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some works managed to partly improve the inefficiency by using the "dimension-modulus reduction" technique [16,17] to make ciphertexts have smaller dimensions and coefficients, and some by using the "ciphertext packing" technique [18][19][20] managed to encrypt an array of plaintexts in a single ciphertext and even encrypt a matrix of plaintexts in a single ciphertext [21,22]. But none of them achieved a "sufficiently high" rate; that is, none of them break the rate-1/2 bottleneck.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%