2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpaa.2011.02.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Homology of artinian and Matlis reflexive modules, I

Abstract: a b s t r a c tLet R be a commutative local noetherian ring, and let L and L ′ be R-modules. We investigate the properties of the functors Tor R i (L, −) and Ext i R (L, −). For instance, we show the following: (a) if L and L ′ are artinian, then Tor R i (L, L ′ ) is artinian, and Ext i R (L, L ′ ) is noetherian over the completion  R; (b) if L is artinian and L ′ is Matlis reflexive, then Ext i R (L, L ′ ), Ext i R (L ′ , L), and Tor R i (L, L ′ ) are Matlis reflexive.Also, we study the vanishing behavior of… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…So, it follows from Lemma 2.1 and adjointness, that the R-modules Ext i R (R/I, T ) ≃ D(Tor R i (R/I, M)) are Artinian for all i ≥ 0. Now, it follows from [19,Lemma 1.15(a)] that, the R-modules Tor R i (R/I, M) are finitely generated for all i ≥ 0, as required.…”
Section: A Category Of Modules Which Is Abelianmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…So, it follows from Lemma 2.1 and adjointness, that the R-modules Ext i R (R/I, T ) ≃ D(Tor R i (R/I, M)) are Artinian for all i ≥ 0. Now, it follows from [19,Lemma 1.15(a)] that, the R-modules Tor R i (R/I, M) are finitely generated for all i ≥ 0, as required.…”
Section: A Category Of Modules Which Is Abelianmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…(1) As H d a (R) is an Artinian and m-torsion R-module (cf. Lemma 2.3), then it follows by [12,Proposition 5.8] that H d a (R) ⊗ R H d a (R) = 0. To this end note that from Proposition 2.4, we have depth…”
Section: 2mentioning
confidence: 98%
“…all terms in the above long exact sequence are finitely generated by[13, Theorem 2.2]. Now, a simple use of Nakayama's lemma shows that pdR (T ) < ∞ if and only if pd R (Hom R (R/xR, T )) < ∞.…”
mentioning
confidence: 97%