1980
DOI: 10.1086/158065
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Homologously collapsing stellar cores

Abstract: We investigate the collapse of nonrotating gas sp~eres with a polytropic.equ~tion of state.: n = 3, corresponding toy = 4/3. Such polytropes provide~ re~sonable approximatiOn t Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

8
238
0
2

Year Published

1983
1983
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 239 publications
(248 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
8
238
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…At ρ c ≈ 10 3 g cm −3 the deviation from homology is evident. Goldreich & Weber (1980) found analytically that in Newtonian theory a star with polytropic index Γ = 4/3 should contract strictly homologously. The deviation from homologous collapse observed in the simulation is mainly due to effects of general relativity: time dilation results in a slower advance of local proper time τ (r) near the center of the star, and the proper volume element √ −gdr is larger than in Newtonian gravity.…”
Section: Evolution Of Collapsing Smsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…At ρ c ≈ 10 3 g cm −3 the deviation from homology is evident. Goldreich & Weber (1980) found analytically that in Newtonian theory a star with polytropic index Γ = 4/3 should contract strictly homologously. The deviation from homologous collapse observed in the simulation is mainly due to effects of general relativity: time dilation results in a slower advance of local proper time τ (r) near the center of the star, and the proper volume element √ −gdr is larger than in Newtonian gravity.…”
Section: Evolution Of Collapsing Smsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…As the initial iron core collapses, an inner, homologous core will maintain a roughly self-similar, index 3 polytropic structure [26,39]. This makes intuitive sense because the pressure support in the star is dominated by relativistically degenerate electrons with Fermi level (chemical potential) µ e ≈ 11.1 MeV(ρ 10 Y e ) 1/3 , where ρ 10 is the density in units of 10 10 g cm −3 .…”
Section: Effect Of Shock Wave Passagementioning
confidence: 99%
“…When silicon shell burning pushes the iron core over its effective Chandrasekhar mass, collapse is initiated by a combination of electron capture and photo-disintegration of heavy nuclei, both leading to a depletion of central pressure support. Massive stars in the approximate mass range of about 10 to 100 solar masses (M ⊙ ) experience such a collapse phase until their homologously contracting [1,2] inner core reaches densities near and above nuclear saturation density where the nuclear equation of state (EoS) stiffens, leading to an almost instantaneous rebound of the inner core (core bounce) into the still supersonically infalling outer core. The hydrodynamic supernova shock is born, travels outward in radius and mass, but rapidly loses its kinetic energy to the dissociation of infalling iron-group nuclei and to neutrinos that deleptonize the immediate postshock material and stream off from these regions quasi-freely.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%