2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.gene.2006.08.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Homologous recombination and the pattern of nucleotide substitution in Ehrlichia ruminantium

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
21
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
(41 reference statements)
6
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In preliminary analyses, complicated methods making more assumptions (Li 1993;Yang and Nielsen 2000) yielded essentially identical results, as has been found in other studies when the number of substitutions per site is small, as in the present data (Hughes and French 2007). Within each of the 222 sequence datasets, we computed the synonymous nucleotide diversity (π S ), which is the mean of d S values for all pairwise comparisons; and the nonsynonymous nucleotide diversity (π N ), which is the mean of d N values for all pairwise comparisons (Nei and Kumar 2000).…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 90%
“…In preliminary analyses, complicated methods making more assumptions (Li 1993;Yang and Nielsen 2000) yielded essentially identical results, as has been found in other studies when the number of substitutions per site is small, as in the present data (Hughes and French 2007). Within each of the 222 sequence datasets, we computed the synonymous nucleotide diversity (π S ), which is the mean of d S values for all pairwise comparisons; and the nonsynonymous nucleotide diversity (π N ), which is the mean of d N values for all pairwise comparisons (Nei and Kumar 2000).…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Standard errors of π S , π N , and π were estimated by the bootstrap method, which takes into account the non-independence of pairwise comparisons (Nei and Kumar 2000); and z-tests were used to test equality of nucleotide diversities in different genomic regions. In preliminary analyses, more complicated methods for estimating d, d S , and d N yielded essentially identical results, as has been found in other studies when the number of substitutions per site is small (Hughes and French 2007), as in the present data.…”
Section: Nucleotide Sequence Diversitysupporting
confidence: 90%
“…This pattern is predicted because the neutral theory predicts that most nonsynonymous mutations are harmful to protein function and thus will tend to be eliminated by purifying selection, whereas synonymous mutations are much more likely to be selectively neutral or nearly so. The fact that the vast majority of genes show this pattern provides strong support for the neutral theory (Li et al, 1985;Endo et al, 1996;Hughes and Friedman, 2005;Hughes and French, 2007).…”
Section: Historical Background Neo-darwinismmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…In some cases, reporting evidence of positive selection, especially when the evidence is based on conservative tests, may serve to stimulate further studies that will examine the function of the gene involved and suggest possible mechanisms for the apparent positive selection (Hughes and French, 2007). On the other hand, it may prove difficult to test certain claims of positive selection that have been proposed on the basis of statistical arguments alone.…”
Section: Conclusion: Does It Matter?mentioning
confidence: 99%