Abstract:Background
Ongoing outbreaks of COVID-19 are driven by waning immunity following primary immunizations and emergence of new SARS-CoV-2 variants which escape vaccine-induced neutralizing antibodies. It has been suggested that heterologous boosters could enhance and potentially maintain population immunity.
Methods
We assessed immunogenicity and reactogenicity of booster doses of different formulations of aluminium hydroxide-ad… Show more
“…A previously reported study investigated heterologous boosting with SCB-2019 in Brazilian adults primed at least 6 months previously with the ChAdOx1-S COVID-19 vaccine with immunogenicity assays performed in the same laboratory as the present study [ 10 ]. Heterologous SCB-2019 was more immunogenic than homologous ChAdOx1-S; 15 days after boosting with SCB-2019 or ChAdOx1-S the respective neutralizing antibody GMTs were 822 versus 274 IU/mL against prototype SARS-CoV-2, 419 versus 123 (1/dilution) against Delta, and 65 versus 31 (1/dilution) against Omicron (B.1.1.529).…”
Background
We compared homologous and heterologous boosting in adults primed with whole-virus inactivated COVID-19 vaccine, CoronaVac, with recombinant protein vaccine, SCB-2019, to overcome waning vaccine-derived immunogenicity and “vaccine evasion” by SARS-CoV-2 variants.
Methods
We randomized adults (18–72 years) in the Philippines previously immunized with two or three CoronaVac doses to receive homologous or heterologous full or half doses of SCB-2019 boosters. We assessed non-inferiority/superiority of neutralizing antibody (NAb) responses against prototype SARS-CoV-2 after 15 days and NAb against a panel of SARS-CoV-2 Delta and Omicron variants in subsets (30‒50 per arm). Participants recorded solicited, unsolicited and serious adverse events.
Results
In 2-dose CoronaVac-primed adults prototype NAb geometric mean titers (GMT) were 203 IU/mL (95% CI: 182–227) and 939 IU/mL (841–1049) after CoronaVac and SCB-2019 boosters; the GMT ratio (4.63 [3.95–5.41]) met pre-defined non-inferiority and post hoc superiority criteria. In 3-dose CoronaVac-immunized adults NAb GMTs against prototype were 279 IU/mL (240–325), 1044 IU/mL (898–1213), and 668 IU/mL (520–829) after CoronaVac, full and half dose SCB-2019 boosters, respectively. NAb GMT ratios against Delta and Omicron variants comparing full or half SCB-2019 doses with CoronaVac were all greater than 2. Reactogenicity consisted mainly of mild-moderate injection site pain, and mild-moderate headache and fatigue, evenly balanced between groups. No vaccine-related serious adverse events were reported.
Conclusion
Boosting CoronaVac-immunized adults with full or half doses of SCB-2019 was well tolerated with superior immunogenicity than homologous boosting, particularly against newly emerged variants, supporting use of SCB-2019 for booster vaccination.
“…A previously reported study investigated heterologous boosting with SCB-2019 in Brazilian adults primed at least 6 months previously with the ChAdOx1-S COVID-19 vaccine with immunogenicity assays performed in the same laboratory as the present study [ 10 ]. Heterologous SCB-2019 was more immunogenic than homologous ChAdOx1-S; 15 days after boosting with SCB-2019 or ChAdOx1-S the respective neutralizing antibody GMTs were 822 versus 274 IU/mL against prototype SARS-CoV-2, 419 versus 123 (1/dilution) against Delta, and 65 versus 31 (1/dilution) against Omicron (B.1.1.529).…”
Background
We compared homologous and heterologous boosting in adults primed with whole-virus inactivated COVID-19 vaccine, CoronaVac, with recombinant protein vaccine, SCB-2019, to overcome waning vaccine-derived immunogenicity and “vaccine evasion” by SARS-CoV-2 variants.
Methods
We randomized adults (18–72 years) in the Philippines previously immunized with two or three CoronaVac doses to receive homologous or heterologous full or half doses of SCB-2019 boosters. We assessed non-inferiority/superiority of neutralizing antibody (NAb) responses against prototype SARS-CoV-2 after 15 days and NAb against a panel of SARS-CoV-2 Delta and Omicron variants in subsets (30‒50 per arm). Participants recorded solicited, unsolicited and serious adverse events.
Results
In 2-dose CoronaVac-primed adults prototype NAb geometric mean titers (GMT) were 203 IU/mL (95% CI: 182–227) and 939 IU/mL (841–1049) after CoronaVac and SCB-2019 boosters; the GMT ratio (4.63 [3.95–5.41]) met pre-defined non-inferiority and post hoc superiority criteria. In 3-dose CoronaVac-immunized adults NAb GMTs against prototype were 279 IU/mL (240–325), 1044 IU/mL (898–1213), and 668 IU/mL (520–829) after CoronaVac, full and half dose SCB-2019 boosters, respectively. NAb GMT ratios against Delta and Omicron variants comparing full or half SCB-2019 doses with CoronaVac were all greater than 2. Reactogenicity consisted mainly of mild-moderate injection site pain, and mild-moderate headache and fatigue, evenly balanced between groups. No vaccine-related serious adverse events were reported.
Conclusion
Boosting CoronaVac-immunized adults with full or half doses of SCB-2019 was well tolerated with superior immunogenicity than homologous boosting, particularly against newly emerged variants, supporting use of SCB-2019 for booster vaccination.
“…A previously reported study investigated heterologous boosting with SCB-2019 in Brazilian adults primed at least 6 months previously with the ChAdOx1-S vector COVID-19 vaccine with immunogenicity assays performed in the same laboratory as the present study [10]. These efficacy estimates were obtained against a background of circulating SARS-CoV-2 variants, mainly Delta, Gamma and Mu, but the high immunogenicity we show against the Omicron variants in this study support the notion that heterologous boosting with SCB-2019 would be efficacious against those new variants too.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Heterologous boosting has been extensively investigated with some of the many possible combinations of other COVID-19 vaccines including priming with mRNA vaccines and heterologous boosting with vector-based or whole inactivated (CoronaVac) vaccines and have generally resulted in higher immunogenicity [9][10][11][12][13]. Importantly, the higher responses with heterologous boosters includes improvements in neutralizing activity against the most recent circulating variants, the Omicron sub-lineages.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sera prepared immediately from both blood draws were stored at -80°C for shipping to VisMederi srl (Siena, Italy) for the immunogenicity analyses. Immunogenicity was measured in all available sera from Days 1 and 15 as virus neutralizing antibodies (NAb) in a microneutralization assay using prototype Wuhan-Hu-1 SARS-CoV-2 [10]. Neutralizing responses were also measured in a subset of each vaccine group (n = 50 per subset) against the SARS-CoV-2 variants, Delta (B.1.617.2) and Omicron sub-lineages BA.1, BA.2, BA.4, and BA.5.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Decreases in vaccine-induced immunity due to the natural waning of antibody titers from the first month post-vaccination [5] and this lower susceptibility of the new variants to vaccine-induced immunity has led to the observation of lower protective efficacy from the first licensed COVID-19 vaccines [6,7]. This has driven the implementation of booster vaccination campaigns, especially with vaccines heterologous to the primary series in an effort to broaden the immune response and consequently the protection against new variants [8][9][10][11][12][13].…”
Background: The global COVID-19 pandemic has peaked but some countries such as China are reporting serious infectious outbreaks due to SARS-CoV-2 variants. Waning vaccine-derived immunogenicity and mutations in variants allowing vaccine evasion require new booster immunization approaches. We compared homologous and heterologous boosting in adults previously fully primed with a whole-virus inactivated COVID-19 vaccine. Methods: At multiple sites in the Philippines we enrolled 430 adults (18-72 years) immunized with two doses of CoronaVac at least 3 months previously and randomly assigned them to receive homologous (CoronaVac, n = 216) or heterologous (recombinant protein vaccine, SCB-2019, n = 214) booster doses. Non-inferiority/superiority of the neutralizing antibody (NAb) response 15 days after boosting was measured by microneutralization against prototype SARS-CoV-2, and Delta and Omicron variants in subsets (50 per arm). Participants recorded solicited local and systemic adverse events for 7 days, unsolicited AEs until Day 29, and serious adverse events until Day 60. Results: NAb geometric mean titers (GMT) against prototype on Day 15 were 744 (95% CI: 669-828) and 164 (143-189) in heterologous and homologous groups, respectively, with a heterologous/homologous GMT ratio of 4.63 (3.95-5.41), meeting both pre-defined non-inferiority and superiority criteria. Similarly, geometric mean-fold rises for NAb against Delta and Omicron BA.1, BA.2, BA.4 and BA.5 variants were superior after heterologous SCB-2019 (range 3.01-4.66) than homologous CoronaVac (range 0.85-1.6) in an exploratory analysis. Reactogenicity and safety measures were evenly balanced between groups; the most frequent local reaction was mild or moderate injection site pain; mild or moderate headache and fatigue were the most frequent systemic adverse events. No vaccine-related serious adverse events were reported. Conclusion: Heterologous boosting of CoronaVac-immunized adults with SCB-2019 was well tolerated with superior immunogenicity than homologous boosting, particularly for newly emerged variants, supporting use of SCB-2019 for booster vaccination.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.