2009
DOI: 10.1055/s-0029-1191615
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Homograft implantation for aortic valve replacement since 15 years – results and follow-up

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, it has been apparent in recent years, as our article has shown, that the long-term durability does not seem to be superior compared with biological xenoprostheses [16,17], due to chronic degeneration of the HGs, leading to fibrosis and calcification along with intense root calcification (Fig. 5).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…However, it has been apparent in recent years, as our article has shown, that the long-term durability does not seem to be superior compared with biological xenoprostheses [16,17], due to chronic degeneration of the HGs, leading to fibrosis and calcification along with intense root calcification (Fig. 5).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…The preservation technique was developed from fresh-wet valves to cryopreserved homografts that underwent sterilization with an antibiotic cocktail [4]. The implantation technique was also improved from the subcoronary implantation to root replacement with reimplantation of the coronary arteries [16]. The use of pulmonary homografts in aortic position showed an impaired outcome in the long-term follow-up leading to the termination of using those grafts [17].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%