“…Due to the variety of factors affecting the measurement of wind speed, that is, its high natural short-term variance (Balling and Cerveny, 2005;Jakob, 2010), long-term trends (Vautard et al, 2010;McVicar et al, 2012), and the relatively high spatial variability (Azorin-Molina et al, 2014), as well as the high sensitivity of wind to local site conditions (WMO, 2017), implementing quality control and homogenization procedures on wind series has been challenging. To summarize, only a few approaches have been developed for mean wind speed so far in recent years: (a) Wang (2008) and Wan et al (2010) used the RHtestV2 data homogenization package (Wang and Feng, 2007) for Canadian monthly mean wind speed data, and Si et al (2018) Szentimrey, 1999Szentimrey, , 2008 to homogenize daily wind speed series for Ireland, for the greater Beijing area (China) and Hungary, respectively; (c) Štěpánek et al (2013), Azorin-Molina et al (2014), and Minola et al (2016) used the AnClim package (Štěpánek, 2004) to detect sudden break points in monthly wind speed series for the Czech Republic, Spain and Portugal, and Sweden, respectively; (d) Guijarro (2015) and Azorin-Molina et al (2018b) applied the Climatol package to detect artificial change points and adjust inhomogeneities in monthly wind speed time series in Spain and Portugal and Saudi Arabia, respectively; and (e) Laapas and Venäläinen (2017) Alexandersson, 1986) and the Maronna-Yohai test to monthly, seasonal, and annual aggregates. None of these methods stands out as being best, so different approaches have been applied thereby justifying the need of benchmarking the performance of homogenization of wind speed data, as Venema et al (2012) conducted in HOME for air temperature and precipitation.…”