2020
DOI: 10.1134/s0016266320030077
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Homogenization of the Fourth-Order Elliptic Operator with Periodic Coefficients with Correctors Taken into Account

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In recent years further progress has been achieved in this topic. We quote here [26], where operator estimates were obtained for the Stokes system, [71,35,39,40,53,38,67,68] that dealt with elliptic operators of higher order in R d , and [62,63,66], where the higher order elliptic operators in a bounded domain were considered.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent years further progress has been achieved in this topic. We quote here [26], where operator estimates were obtained for the Stokes system, [71,35,39,40,53,38,67,68] that dealt with elliptic operators of higher order in R d , and [62,63,66], where the higher order elliptic operators in a bounded domain were considered.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another method to prove operator estimates in homogenization is based on the Floquet-Bloch transformation and spectral arguments. It is used for high order operators, e.g., in [2], [21], and [8]. The result recently announced in [8] is related to a fourth-order elliptic self-adjoint matrix differential operator A ε with ε-periodic coefficients which satisfies a certain factorization condition.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is used for high order operators, e.g., in [2], [21], and [8]. The result recently announced in [8] is related to a fourth-order elliptic self-adjoint matrix differential operator A ε with ε-periodic coefficients which satisfies a certain factorization condition. In [8], we find resolvent approximations of the same order of smallness in error as in Theorem 5.2, but they look rather differently compared to that of (2.18).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%