2019
DOI: 10.1007/s00205-019-01467-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Homogenization of Parabolic Equations with Non-self-similar Scales

Abstract: This paper is concerned with quantitative homogenization of second-order parabolic systems with periodic coefficients varying rapidly in space and time, in different scales. We obtain large-scale interior and boundary Lipschitz estimates as well as interior C 1,α and C 2,α estimates by utilizing higher-order correctors. We also investigate the problem of convergence rates for initial-boundary value problems.MSC2010: 35B27, 35K40.

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Let us first consider a slightly simpler case A ε (x, t) = A(x, t, x/ε, t/δ 2 ) with arbitrary (ε, δ) ∈ (0, 1] 2 , and A(x, t, y, s) is periodic in (y, s) ∈ R d × R. We recall that the special cases A ε (x, t) = A(x/ε, t/ε k ) with k > 0, and A ε (x, t) = A(x/ε, t/δ 2 ) with arbitrary (ε, δ) ∈ (0, 1] 2 have been studied in [17] and [16], respectively. In particular, the Lipschitz estimate uniform in (ε, δ) was derived in [16] by the access decay method combined with a proper rescaling argument.…”
Section: 2mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Let us first consider a slightly simpler case A ε (x, t) = A(x, t, x/ε, t/δ 2 ) with arbitrary (ε, δ) ∈ (0, 1] 2 , and A(x, t, y, s) is periodic in (y, s) ∈ R d × R. We recall that the special cases A ε (x, t) = A(x/ε, t/ε k ) with k > 0, and A ε (x, t) = A(x/ε, t/δ 2 ) with arbitrary (ε, δ) ∈ (0, 1] 2 have been studied in [17] and [16], respectively. In particular, the Lipschitz estimate uniform in (ε, δ) was derived in [16] by the access decay method combined with a proper rescaling argument.…”
Section: 2mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Let u λ ε be a weak solution of −div(A λ (x, x/ε 1 )∇u λ ε ) = 0 in B 2r , and set δ = max 1≤i≤d λ −1 i ε 1 ≤ r ≤ 1. By performing the same analysis as Section 3 in [16] (see [17] and [22] for the original ideas), one can prove that there exists a weak solution…”
Section: 20)mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations