The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2016
DOI: 10.1007/s00526-016-0988-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Homogenization of integral energies under periodically oscillating differential constraints

Abstract: A homogenization result for a family of integral energiesis presented, where the fields uε are subjected to periodic first order oscillating differential constraints in divergence form. The work is based on the theory of A -quasiconvexity with variable coefficients and on twoscale convergence techniques.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Due to the non-convexity of the sets M s and SO (2), it does not fall within the scope of works on gradient-constraint problems like [7,8,12], either. For a study of homogenization problems that involve constraints imposed by special linear first order partial differential equations we refer to [5,18,21].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to the non-convexity of the sets M s and SO (2), it does not fall within the scope of works on gradient-constraint problems like [7,8,12], either. For a study of homogenization problems that involve constraints imposed by special linear first order partial differential equations we refer to [5,18,21].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where f : Ω×R N ×R d → [0, +∞) has standard p-growth, Ω ⊂ R N is a bounded open set, ε → 0, and the fields u ε : Ω → R d are subjected to x−dependent differential constraints of the type 1) or in divergence form We recently analyzed in [10] the limit case in which α = 0, β > 0, the energy density is independent of the first two variables, and the fields {u ε } are subjected to (1.2). We will consider here the case in which α > 0, β = 0 and (1.1), i.e., the energy density is oscillating but the differential constraint is fixed and in "nondivergence" form.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As in [10] and [11], the proof of this result is based on the unfolding operator, introduced in [6,7] (see also [21,22]). In contrast with [11, Theorem 1.1] (i.e.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The main objective is to study properties for ε → 0 of I ε (u ε ) := Ω f (x, x ε , ∇u ε (x)) dx, where f is (0, 1) nperiodic in the middle variable. Homogenization problems are not only restricted to gradients but new results in the context of A-quasiconvexity (even with non-constant coefficients) recently appeared, e.g., in [74]. Various other generalizations including stochastic features to describe randomness in the distribution of inhomogeneities can be found in the papers by Dal Maso and Modica [71], Messaoudi and Michaille [168] or the recent work of Gloria, Neukamm, and Otto [104].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%