“…t ) i =(γ −1 ) ij (t, q ǫ t )(−∂ t ψ j (t, q ǫ t ) − ∂ q j V (t, q ǫ t ) + F j (t, x ǫ t ))dt (3.6) + (γ −1 ) ij (t, q ǫ t )σ jρ (t, x ǫ t )dW ρ t − (γ −1 ) ij (t, q ǫ t )∂ q j K(t, q ǫ t , z ǫ t )dt + (z ǫ t ) j ∂ q l (γ −1 ) ij (t, q ǫ t )∂ z l K(t, q ǫ t , z ǫ t )dt − d((γ −1 ) ij (t, q ǫ t )(u ǫ t ) j ) + (u ǫ t ) j ∂ t (γ −1 ) ij (t, q ǫ t )dt, where u ǫ t ≡ p ǫ t − ψ(t, q ǫ t ), z ǫ t ≡ u ǫ t √ ǫ, and γ ik (t, q) ≡ γ ik (t, q) + ∂ q k ψ i (t, q) − ∂ q i ψ k (t, q). (3.7)We define the components ofγ −1 such that(γ −1 ) ijγ jk = δ i k ,(3.8)and for any v i we define(γ −1 v) i = (γ −1 ) ij v j .Under the additional Assumptions 5-7 in[8], which include further restrictions on the form of the Hamiltonian, we were then able to show that…”