2015
DOI: 10.1007/s40072-015-0058-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Homogenization of Brinkman flows in heterogeneous dynamic media

Abstract: In this paper, we study Brinkman's equations with microscale properties that are highly heterogeneous in space and time. The time variations are controlled by a stochastic particle dynamics described by an SDE. The particle dynamics can be thought as particle deposition that often occurs in filter problems. Our main results include the derivation of macroscale equations and showing that the macroscale equations are deterministic. The latter is important for our (also many other) applications as it greatly simp… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
(24 reference statements)
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Isolating the term (1.2), a uniform estimate in H 2 (D) 3 was needed to be able to pass to the limit. Unfortunately, while the random variable u ε in [2] was uniformly bounded in the Sobolev space H 2 (D) 3 , in the current paper it is only uniformly bounded in the Sobolev space H 1 (D) 3 . Instead, the limit in the term (1.2) will be performed by using a Khasminskii type argument, following an idea already introduced in [4] where as mentioned earlier, our term α(·, v ε )u ε does not satisfy the same assumptions.…”
Section: Introduction and Formulation Of The Problemmentioning
confidence: 79%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Isolating the term (1.2), a uniform estimate in H 2 (D) 3 was needed to be able to pass to the limit. Unfortunately, while the random variable u ε in [2] was uniformly bounded in the Sobolev space H 2 (D) 3 , in the current paper it is only uniformly bounded in the Sobolev space H 1 (D) 3 . Instead, the limit in the term (1.2) will be performed by using a Khasminskii type argument, following an idea already introduced in [4] where as mentioned earlier, our term α(·, v ε )u ε does not satisfy the same assumptions.…”
Section: Introduction and Formulation Of The Problemmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…These particles have a faster motion than the motion of the fluid flow and are driven by a stochastic perturbation of Brownian type. A simpler version of this model has been studied in [2], where the diffusion A was considered to be constant and equal to 1. The heterogeneous diffusion brings an additional difficulty and makes this problem more realistic since one deals with heterogeneous permeability fields in most porous media problems.…”
Section: Introduction and Formulation Of The Problemmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Research in this direction is still at its infancy, despite the importance of such problems in both applied and fundamental sciences. Some relevant interesting work have recently been undertaken, mainly for parabolic SPDEs; see for instance [3,8,10,11,21,43,44]. We also note the closely related work [3,25,15,16] dealing with stochastic homogenization for SPDEs with small parameters.…”
mentioning
confidence: 94%
“…The techniques used to pass to the limit in the mathematical model (1.1) are a generalization of the techniques used in our recent paper [8], where a simpler reaction diffusion model was considered. Let us mention that, like in [8] and [9] the random coefficient α does depend on the spatial variable x/ε and the process (v ε 1 , v ε 2 ) which is ergodic for frozen (u ε 1 , u ε 2 ). Hence, the passage to the limit involves a combination of two kind of convergences: averaging (in time) and homogenization (in space).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%