2015
DOI: 10.1007/s11356-015-5109-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Homogeneous static magnetic field of different orientation induces biological changes in subacutely exposed mice

Abstract: It has been shown that static magnetic field (SMF) of moderate intensity produces considerable impact on biological systems. SMF can be homogeneous or inhomogeneous. In many studies, inhomogeneous SMF was employed. Aware that inhomogeneous SMF could result in experimental variability, we investigated the influence of a vertical homogeneous SMF of different orientation. Male Swiss-Webster 9- to 10-week-old mice were subacutely exposed to upward- and downward-oriented SMF of 128 mT generated by a cyclotron for 1… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
22
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
1
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…At the cellular level, electromagnetic field affects cell communication, governs the cytoskeletal organisation, and structural components of the plasma membrane and changes the dynamics of [Ca 2+ ] ic , as reviewed elsewhere (Pesce, Patruno, Speranza, & Reale, ). In particular, electromagnetic stimulation has been shown to increase the release of the anti‐inflammatory cytokine interleukin (IL)‐10, simultaneously leading to a decrease of the release of pro‐inflammatory cytokines, such as IL‐6 and tumor necrosis factor (TNF‐α), both in macrophages and lymphocytes (Vergallo et al, ), as well as in tendon cells (de Girolamo et al, , ), particularly, in a time and field orientation (Milovanovich et al, ; Ross & Harrison, ), as well as field intensity and exposure period dependent manner (de Girolamo et al, ). The anti‐inflammatory effect of PEMF may somewhat rely on the fact that it is an agonist for adenosine receptors (ARs), particularly increasing the density and functionality of A 2A and A 3 ARs seen by enhanced release of IL‐10 (anti‐inflammatory cytokine) and diminished release of IL‐6, TNF‐α (pro‐inflammatory cytokines) in musculoskeletal tissue related cell lines (human T/C‐28a2 chondrocytes and hFOB 1.19 osteoblasts) (Vincenzi et al, ).…”
Section: Beyond Repair: Shooting For Regenerationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At the cellular level, electromagnetic field affects cell communication, governs the cytoskeletal organisation, and structural components of the plasma membrane and changes the dynamics of [Ca 2+ ] ic , as reviewed elsewhere (Pesce, Patruno, Speranza, & Reale, ). In particular, electromagnetic stimulation has been shown to increase the release of the anti‐inflammatory cytokine interleukin (IL)‐10, simultaneously leading to a decrease of the release of pro‐inflammatory cytokines, such as IL‐6 and tumor necrosis factor (TNF‐α), both in macrophages and lymphocytes (Vergallo et al, ), as well as in tendon cells (de Girolamo et al, , ), particularly, in a time and field orientation (Milovanovich et al, ; Ross & Harrison, ), as well as field intensity and exposure period dependent manner (de Girolamo et al, ). The anti‐inflammatory effect of PEMF may somewhat rely on the fact that it is an agonist for adenosine receptors (ARs), particularly increasing the density and functionality of A 2A and A 3 ARs seen by enhanced release of IL‐10 (anti‐inflammatory cytokine) and diminished release of IL‐6, TNF‐α (pro‐inflammatory cytokines) in musculoskeletal tissue related cell lines (human T/C‐28a2 chondrocytes and hFOB 1.19 osteoblasts) (Vincenzi et al, ).…”
Section: Beyond Repair: Shooting For Regenerationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…). We also compared two opposite magnetic field directions because there are studies indicating that the upward and downward magnetic field directions could have differential biological effects in mice [De Luka et al, ; Milovanovich et al, ]. Cells were cultured in cell culture plates (Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An inhomogeneous static magnetic field of 31.7–232.0 mT was shown to have a cytoprotective effect on low‐cisPt‐concentration‐treated SH‐SY5Y cells, suggesting that exposure to various sources of static magnetic field in cancer patients under a cisPt regimen should be strictly controlled [Vergallo et al, ]. Milovanovich et al [] reported that an upward and downward‐oriented homogeneous static magnetic field of 128 mT affected spleen, brain, kidney, and liver in mice after 1 h/day exposure during a 5 day period. The subacute exposure to the homogeneous static magnetic field of 128 mT for 1 h per day in 15 consecutive days induced a pseudoanemia status with an increase in MCT4 and Glut4 proteins in glycolytic muscle of rats [Elferchichi et al, ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The magnetic fields in our study were chosen to be strong, that is of the order of hundreds of mT, since such fields had been observed to cause increased germination of various plants [Vashisth and Nagarajan, ; Grewal and Maheshwari, ; Shine et al, ] as well as to affect other species [László et al, ; Vergallo et al, ; Elferchichi et al, ; Milovanovich et al, ]. The experiences of other researchers were also used to determine the exposure time schedule.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation